Parliament in the United Kingdom chooses not to hold artificial intelligence companies to hold copyrights

The ministers in the United Kingdom’s House of Commons prohibited amending the draft data law that requires artificial intelligence companies to disclose their use of copyrights protected, . This transparency modification of the text is stripped by calling something called financial concession, a mysterious parliamentary procedure indicating that any new regulations require a new budget.

The official website of the United Kingdom Parliament “It can be used by the public as reasons to cancel any suggestion of the House of Lords, which has cost effects.” This seems exactly what happened here, with those who support the removal of the adjustment that raises the cost of a possible organizational body. There were 297 deputies voted in favor of removing the amendment, with 168 oppositions.

Chris Bryant, Minister of Data Protection, said he realized that this might feel that it is a “horrific moment” for creative industries, but he believes that amending transparency requires changes “in the tour and not only gradually.”

Amendment Earlier this week. Baroneh Biban Kidon responded to the Lord’s step today by saying that “the government failed to answer the background of the background who asked again and again” if not now? “Mrs. Kidon continued to accuse the government of allowing” the theft on a large scale and “jamming” of those who are hunting. “

She concluded that “through the community of creativity and commercial, throughout Parliament, people feel exposed because the government plays the role of parliamentary chess with their livelihoods.”

As expected, Kidron will make a hostile amendment before the draft law return to the Lords next week. This puts another confrontation when the bill returns to the rumors of another pass.

Owen Merridith, CEO of the Media Association, told Guardian It is very disappointing that the government has failed to listen to the deep concerns of creative industries, including news publishers who are very essential to download our democratic values. “The government is accused of using parliamentary measures” to dismiss industry fears, instead of taking this opportunity in a timely manner to introduce transparency that will lead the dynamic licensing market for very valuable creative content in the United Kingdom. “

The government’s favorite plan includes reliance on the condition of canceling the subscription. This would give artificial intelligence companies free to any content and all, except in cases where the creator is explicitly chosen.

Last week, hundreds of artists and organizations To urge the government not to “give our work far at the request of a handful of strong external technology companies.” Among the artists participating in this campaign are Paul McCartney, Elton John and the medicine of Leiba, among others.

America is scheduled to host its own version of the game “Giving everything to AI”. In a clause, Republicans infiltrated the budget bill For ten years. It will end well.