Colorado is likely to face a major lawsuit related to a new law on the protection of transgender people and how it can violate freedom of expression And the rights of parents.
On Friday, Governor Jared Police signed the law Kelly love verbA draft law that expands the state to combat discrimination for sexually transformed individuals by allowing the “chosen name” to qualify as a form of “sexual expression” protected under the COADA (CADA).
Now, after the draft law has passed, the group has filed a defense of education (De) a lawsuit against the state on behalf of the lack of harm, the Colorado Network for Call and the Protection of Children’s Collerado groups from fears that the law can violate their rights to freedom of expression.
“The definition of the new law of” sexual expression “is unconstitutional constitutional,” the introduction Fox News digital Read. “Because it covers any treatment based on the use of” chosen name “or other forms of the preferred title,” it punished many forms of constitutionally protected speech. ”
The “Senior” transnational bill in Colorado is fears of parents
The new Colorado law would make a “chosen name” a protected form of gender expression. (Fox News Digital)
He continued, “When speakers refer to sexually transformed definition personnel who use accurate biological terms, they are advancing a point of view on a hot political issue: the ideology of the sexes. This type of speech lies in the core First amendment. But the definition of the law for “sexual expression” makes all this speech discriminatory and illegal.
The lawsuit added that, given that CADA prohibits “spreading the discriminatory issue”, the new law may probably prohibit individuals, including parents, because of the non -change of the individual’s name and his gender publicly.
In a statement, Fox News Digital, Sarah Pershal Perry, Vice President of Defense of Education, said that the law “raises” parents and doctors to protect “preferred sexual Orthodoxy” in the state.
“Colorado does not seem to stop losing in the Supreme Court regarding the constitutional challenges of its laws to combat discrimination. However, the ruler Polis has clearly signed the unconstitutional repetition,” Perry said.
Defense for education argued that the new law violates the right to criticize the ideology of both sexes. (Getty Images/Istock)
De seeks a preliminary and permanent judicial order to enforce this new definition as a violation of the first and fourteenth amendments to the use of “unconstitutional” language and enforcement.
“The lack of harm is proud of the challenge challenge by the anti -discrimination law in Colorado,” said Dr. Stanley Goldfirb, Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Fox News Digital communicate to the Ruler’s Office to comment.
Kelly lover did He suffers from fire By the governors and parents in Colorado since it was presented in March. Among the protection in the original draft law is a decision that “killing, wrong, or threatening to publish materials related to healthcare services that confirm sex with the individual” can be considered forms of “forced control” that can affect the child’s custody of children.
After facing a violent reaction, Legionships in Colorado Ultimately, he removed the language with regard to “death” and children’s custody, although opponents are still criticizing the elements of the law for the extensive language.
Kolorado’s parents empty the liberal legislators, which raised changes to the controversial sex bill
The Supreme Court has witnessed multiple cases that included Colorado laws to combat discrimination during the past few years. (Getty Images)
Colorado has been in the center of many prominent issues based on the anti -discrimination laws over the past few years. The most reputable, the owner of Cakeshop, Jack Philips, Cakeshop owner Say several times He refuses to bake a cake that celebrates a wedding of the same sex or a sexual transition.
In 2023, and The Supreme Court ruled Against the state, I found that Colorado laws to combat discrimination cannot force a graphic designer to create wedding sites for wedding parties of the same sex in violation of their beliefs.
https://static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2025/02/judgetransgendercase.png
Source link