Parent groups interact as scotus can cancel the cancellation of subscription in Book LGBTQ lessons

supreme courtFriday’s decision to support parents in Maryland, who fought to withdraw their children from short story lessons in LGBTQ in the classroom in primary schools, were welcomed as a victory for parents’ rights and religious freedom.

“Today’s victory has sent a resounding message to the members of the country’s active schools board of directors: parents’ rights are not optional, and our children do not explore political boards or tools for your radical agenda,” said Alyge Marie, CEO of the Parents Group, the American Parents Alliance, in a statement after the ruling.

She added: “This victory provided a decisive clarification to the members of the board of directors of active schools in Montgomery, Maryland, who showed contempt for the parents’ authority and withdrawal, which explained that the education of children between the ages of 3 years around the ideology of radical sexes was a higher priority than students’ learning, and less than the rights of parents. “

in Resolution 6-3 This fell on ideological lines, the court saw that parents have the right to choose their children from school lessons that could violate their religious beliefs.

Parents tell Scotos: LGBTQ stories in the chapter with our faith

“We have long realized,” Judge Samuel Alto He wrote,, “Parents’ rights to direct“ religious upbringing ”to their children. We have seen that these rights are violated by government policies that interfere greatly with the religious development of children.

“We reject this convergence vision of the state’s strength to strip the critical right of parents in directing the religious development of their children,” Alto wrote.

Parents, from the Muslim Orthodox religions, Catholic and Ukrainian, Fif up a lawsuit against Montgomery County Schools After the boycott refused to allow parents to choose the withdrawal of their school ages from identifying LGBTQ PRIDE stories in the semester. According to BECKET, the legal group that represents the issue of parents, the books “Praid champion are marches, sex transition and pronoun for children.”

While the school council initially allowed parents to choose their children from this curriculum, the board of directors was reflected quickly after many parents requested the cancellation of the subscription, believing that it “undermines the educational obligations of schools towards inclusion, equality and respect,” according to the American Civil Liberties Union, who has made a summary in the court in support to the school area.

Families claimed that the forced participation in these lessons has violated their parental rights and protected religious condemnation under First amendment.

Scotos provisions This term can enhance the protection of religious rights, the expert says

In enormous opposition, Judge Sonia Sotomoor said that allowing children “isolated from being exposed to ideas and concepts that may contradict their parents’ religious beliefs” was a threat to democracy and multi -cultural society.

She wrote: “The ruling is consumed today in this new reality. They act as a long -term previous aspect. The court penetrates a constitutional right to avoid exposure to” accurate “topics, unlike the religious principles that parents want to instill in their children.

“The result will be a chaos for the public schools of this nation,” Sotomior added.

A professor of law specializing in religious freedom issues and lived in the province of Montgomery Digital had not threatened diversity, but actually protects the diversity of opinion.

Professor Asma Odin said: “It is a matter of protection for pluralism in an initial basic way,” said Professor Asma Odin. “If the anxiety revolves around the inclusion and makes space for various views, it must extend beyond a certain set of things that must be presented to give space to various views. We can do this through procedural flexibility – the ability to finish these readings.”

Click here to cover the media and culture

Odin, a fellow in the Initiative of Faith and Media, who will teach the constitutional law at Michigan State University in the fall, is disturbed by the way the school council rejected the opinions of these parents, with a reference to how one of the members even their views “their opinions” their opinions. “Eggs”

She added: “There must be something in which people have real rights in the difference even on really controversial things, which are really essential from us as people, for our identities. It should be a space where we can get a set of opinions about that.”

According to BECKET, the Montgomery County School Council is one of the few school councils throughout the country to ban notifications and parents’ contributions of importance to sexual and sexual life.

Parents in this case did not try to ban LGBTQ books from the classroom, but they were asking to notify them before using them in the semester instructions and giving them the option to withdraw their children from these lessons.

The reaction of Kelissy Renhardt, President and CEO of Catholic Politics, a conservative political advocacy group, was in a statement, saying: “Every American should be alert that such a case needs to be interfered with the highest court in the country.

She added: “The court ruling sends a clear and strong message: America still respects the rights of parents in raising their children in line with their faith and conscience. School councils do not have any business on families. Let this decision renew our courage.

Click here to get the Fox News app

Lawyer and head of the conservative judicial crises network Carrie Sevirino He said in a statement, “The children of public schools should not be hostage to the wars of culture, and the case of the Supreme Court confirmed today that by restoring the rights of parents to direct the education of their children, especially their religious education,” he said in a statement.

“Ten years ago in Ubergville, Judge Kennedy promised that religious rights would remain respected, even in the face of an increasing doctrine of LGBTQ.