Openai gets a peak plot, non -profit prosecution

Sam German and Eileon Musk were held in a constant confrontation about the fact that Openai worked like profit business despite its non -profit condition. The battle, which was continuing in the public opinion court for years and in the actual courts for several months, began to increase side damage. According to A report from the standard of San FranciscoOpenai’s critics have started receiving call notes from the IQ company about what the company’s leadership seems to be a plot backed by Musk and Mark Zuckerberg.

There is no doubt that a lot of money is thrown into the area of ​​artificial intelligence. But it seems that Openai believes that it is all about its success in the end. According to the standardOpenaii request documents from non -profit organizations and researchers, demanding the delivery of documents related to Musk and Meta. In the case of Nathan Calvin, General Adviser to the Organization of Artificial Intelligence Governance called Encode, these documents are not present, according to the standard.

Calvin is not the only one who gets the request to deliver documents, too. The report indicates that two other groups of artificial intelligence governance have received similar requests. It appears that the madness of greatness in Openai has extended beyond the pages of the summons. Apparently, based on an invitation with non -profit groups that oppose the company’s attempts to restructure and rid its non -profit situation, an Openai representative suggested that the groups “funded by our competitors” and asked “to reveal themselves.”

Some Openai’s goals seem to be the types of people who do not raise doubts unless you are following a red chain via the cork plate. For example, according to the standard, the company summoned the founder of the Future of Life Institute, a non -profit institution that focuses on the use of artificial intelligence in the criminal justice system and started by a secondary school. They also sent requests to Jeffrey Gardner, the LSAT coach in New York, who lives in a house owned by a company called Tesla Place, LLC. Openai described it as a “pillar” used “to hide the true identity” of one of its opponents. Gardner The standard said The company was named after the street, which he used to live and has no relationships with Elon Musk.

Openai seems to be sure that the world has come out. It may be somewhat right. But it is somewhat difficult to try to claim the weak story when you are At a value of $ 500 billion. Is it possible for the worst person in technology to drive non -profit organizations to criticize Openai? certainly. But many people take the shots in a Saman child, for free.

Regardless, it is clear that Altman and Musk are not really worried about combustion or at least disturbing people along the way while settling their hostility. Only last week, Musk, Xai, filing a lawsuit against a former engineer Those who jumped the ship to Openai, claiming that they took the company’s secrets with them. Anything to win, regardless of who is arrested in Crossfire.