One of the worst horror movies in the 1990s got a supplement to choose

When doing it properly, the interactive imagination and terror can be a profitable mixture. Take a series of RL Stine “Give Give Give Goosebumps” for example, which included a single story with selection -based branch lines. The idea was that the reader would play an active role in pushing the story towards a specific direction, whether in the form of simple options for solving puzzles or classic. For example, if a road separates, the reader who chooses the left will fall on a specific page number, which will continue the story after that and subject to the consequences of this choice. This is exciting to choose adventure The “Cry of horror” approach facilitated the experience of the unique stories novelIt also added another layer of anticipation to the dangers inside the narration. Unfortunately, almost all of these interactive books in the Stine’s series are out of printing.

advertisement

Interactive imagination in terror, however, is not limited to novels or short stories. There, “Black Mirror: Bandersnatch”, Emmy Prize (This makes the smart use of anxiety surrounding high options) And Netflix “Camp World Camp Crekaceous: Hidden Adventure”, which motivates a group of children against hungry dinosaurs. But what about direct horror continuation to the video focuses on the concept of the Mukhtar that allows viewers to create 96 (!!!) from the film’s publications? Let’s talk about “Return to House on Haunted Hill” in Victor Garcia, a strangely ambitious supplement for 1999 critical, “House on Haunted Hill”.

“House on Haunted Hill” is doubtful, such as dust, it has achieved exceptionally well, as it achieved $ 65 million worldwide. In the film, some strangers are invited to a party held in an abandoned clinic, where a huge million dollar is offered to anyone who managed to survive at night. If this story looks familiar, it is because: 1999 movie is a new edition of William Castle’s The -Helmous Horror ClassicWhich employs the camp and theatrical fear for a great influence. It goes without saying that the new version fails to measure up to the source materials on all fronts, however He can Treat it as a clock, one time for fun. It is not possible to say the same thing about its continuation, which ends with its branching narration, which makes things worse.

advertisement

If you see “Return to House on Haunted Hill” in a good linear way, it will be run as a noisy re -release of 1999, which is not the first in the first place. But as soon as it feeds on its DVD interactive features, it stops being terrifying in the tour and appears as a rare guard who exudes the politicization. You may think that such strenuous efforts to create branched narratives were planned from the beginning, but this was not the case.

advertisement

The original text program did not contain any branching scenes at all, and the revised versions of the text program reached when the main photography of the film was classified. After announcing news about Sequel DVD Extra-Feature CBR He was “confused” about the filming process, as it gave “everything equal in weighting”, but it was easy to “forget the differences” of events. This is understandable, as the shooting outside the sequence, taking into account 90+, is a narrative branch in mind that can be very confusing even in the most controlled and coherent environments. All the things that have been taken into account, it is perplexing that the complicated story options will lead to scenes with more nudity or incenity, but only one The choice changes the result of “returning home on a haunted hail” in a big way (where – Spoilers! – You can choose to kill each character in the movie at the end).

advertisement

The only merit that the continuation is in its name is the return of Dr. Vanakot “Koms”, which was filmed as A wonderful evil doctor, but it cannot be repaired with a thorny plan in the original movie. However, the continuation denies this innate complexity and frames it as a moral, ethical doctor spoiled by an evil idol (Booooring! Everything else feels distress and inspiring, as there is no amount of narrative mixing sufficient to save a story imagined as a way to circumvent more than an honest attempt to intimidate or entertain.

Although “Return to House on Haunted Hill” may waste the opportunity to do something interesting through its interactive framework, it is possible to use a similar approach in future stories with a more clear artistic vision. After all, the heart of horror is often summarized in the second division options, which puts characters in the consumer mold or the final survivor. In the end, these shipping options should be important.