One of the sources of technological industry for carbon credits in the conflict with Kenyan’s sponsors

There is a program to save in Kenya that technology companies such as Netflix and Meta depend on carbon credits that contradict local sponsors, according to Report from Wall Street Magazine. The problem led to the program he runs The carbon project in Northern Kenya To be suspended, and the credits that the organization already has already bought can be nullified.

The specific carbon capture program uses this grass spread over an area of ​​4.7 million acres of collectively owned land by groups such as Masai, for the carbon tray in the soil. The project gets the use of the land, and in return, the sponsors get part of the revenue from carbon credit sales. The issue that displays the entire program is at the risk of struggle for the agricultural practices of the sponsors. The local agricultural community used the same grazing techniques for generations without a problem, but the carbon project in northern Kenya wants them to “rotate livestock grazing so that herbs can recover and lock more carbon in the soil.” Wall Street Magazine He writes. Some of the sponsors were frustrated by the rules as much as the claim that they had been misled when they originally agreed to participate in the memorization program.

Many technology companies depend on buying carbon balances to help compensate for the negative environmental effects of rapid technological development. You cannot turn on servers that flow movies or artificial intelligence models training 24 hours a day without consuming a lot of electricity and water. Carbon displacement projects are planted trees or manages agricultural programs such as those in Kenya to withdraw carbon from the air, and sell credits to companies to exempt them from their sins.

It is clear that these carbon projects have not always been useful for people who live on the ground they affect. Wall Street Magazine The report deserves reading and enters what it might have the consequences of all of this, but at least, it seems that the signs of retailing technology companies themselves are “neutral of carbon” will be more difficult.