North Korea closes the Rubio brand “the rogue state” as “nonsense”

North Korea criticizes Foreign Minister Marco Rubio He described the country as a “rogue state”, describing it as “nonsense” while pledging to take a “difficult confrontation” to any provocations from the Trump administration.

Rubio made the statement last week during his appearance on “The Megyn Kelly Show”, as he was talking about US foreign policy goals.

“It is not normal for the world to have a single unipolar power. It was not – that was an anomaly. It was a product at the end of the Cold War, but in the end you will return to a point where you have and Rubio said, according to what he said. Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

north korea In response, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that Rubio “talked about nonsense by describing DPRK as a” rogue state “as the foreign policy of the new American administration.

Trump’s proposal “nuclear disarmament” with Russia and China: How will it work?

“The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the American Charity Circles (DPRK) considers that the statements of the hostile Minister of Foreign Affairs to distort the image of the sovereign state without thinking as a dangerous political provocation completely contrary to the principle of international law that considers respect for sovereignty and non -interference in other internal affairs such as reading a statement published by the North Korean government media It rejects it, rejects it strongly and rejects it.

The statement added: “The rough and coarse observations of Rubio show only an unhealthy offer Trump administration.

North Korean soldiers in Russia resort to suicide among the prisoners of the first war by Ukraine

She concluded that “we will never tolerate any provocation to the United States, which has always been hostile to the DPRK and will be hostile to it in the future as well, but it will take a difficult confrontation that meets it as usual.”

“Now more than ever, we need to remember that foreign policy must always be about strengthening the national interest of the United States and doing this, to the possible level, avoiding war and armed conflict, which we saw twice in the last century be very expensive. .

Click here to get the Fox News app

“They celebrate the eighties at the end of this year of the end of World War II. This – I think that if you look at the scale and scope of the destruction and loss that occurred, it will be much worse if we have a universal conflict now.” It seems like an exaggeration, but this – you have – you have Now many countries have the ability to end life on Earth. Thus we need to work hard to avoid armed conflict as much as possible, but not at the expense of our citizen.