Nobody celebrates the twentieth anniversary of a new edition of horror

by Dru diet
| Published 10 seconds ago

I will call you all in a little scenes from the leisure content farm: a group of people should learn through many films and watch some of the upcoming anniversary. It begins with the “fifth anniversary” and works largely with increases every five years at the top. For any reason, it must refer to the anniversary of any movie until people crawl from the wooden works of a few clicks. I do not do this because I just want to write about the films that concern me. I do not care if the fifty anniversary Jaw Because I celebrate Jaw Every day of my life.

However, there was a movie I noticed on the twentieth anniversary. A movie I have never heard one positive word about any of my friends or colleagues. A film is often released as one of the worst renovations on the date of work. Now, this seems to be something that would interest me because I am a cinema. But after spending my time and my life to see it, I should not only agree with consensus, but also to grow a flag says that no one will celebrate the anniversary of this shake, 20 or otherwise.

Bible, Fog Awesome.

Not even near to re -edition

If we only look at Fog In a purely comparative light, it makes it John Carptter And the original Dibra Hill appearance of 1980 is better. I will do a policeman to be a great admirer for the original movie, but I reconsidered it when I decided to see the new version. You know, Fog (1980) It is not a great picture, but it is a strange, strange and effective novel for a movie. He got an atmosphere and solid teams, although he lacks strong personalities. However, after watching a new edition of 2005, I am ready to announce the original masterpiece.

Fog (2005) is mainly a new edition of the original but with some changes that should be in its favor. Unfortunately, it is essential and not important that it is not related to comparison. The few parts withdrawn by the new version are displayed directly from the original, the extent of MOODY and the effectiveness of the original John Carpetter.

Fog It was part of the reuorhesic boom in the first decade of the twentieth century and it seems that it took all the wrong lessons of that time. The film did not preferred as much as aging.

TV movie with more money

The most shocking part of Fog The new version is how she strongly managed to film her story. With a $ 18 million budget, this part of the change was not enough for the effects. Everything is very bad comes like a loop of the bad extraordinary investigation that is canceled after a short season. The level of television production takes everything in the wedge.

This was not assisted by the main casting. Fog It was an attempt to jump Smolville Star Tom Welling in a big time, along with lost Actress Maggie Grace. I hate choosing the actors, but they are not at a level to raise this to something bigger and/or better. It only doubles in the form of an entire “bad TV episode” that radiates this movie.

Because the world is a sick and sad place, I am sure there is someone who loves Fog remake. I managed to get 4 % on Spoiled tomatoes So there is a person ready to go to the bats to treat insomnia. And you know what? that’s cool. I am not here to change anyone’s opinion, so if you love Fog Reshaving, more strength for you. I just know that I will never be able to trust your movie recommendations.

---