New York is going through a draft law to prevent disasters fed by artificial intelligence

Legitimates in New York State An invoice passed On Thursday, this aims to prevent FRANAI, Google and Anthropor models from contributing to disaster scenarios, including the death or injury of more than 100 people, or more than a billion dollars as compensation.

The passage of the law raising the victory of the artificial intelligence movement, which has I lost the land in recent years Since Silicon Valley and Trump’s administration have given priority to speed and innovation. Safety defenders, including Nobel Prize winner Jeffrey Hinton and the pioneer of artificial intelligence research, Yoshua Bingio. If it becomes a law, the draft law will establish the first set of transparency criteria delegated by law for Frontier AI laboratories.

The law raising many of the same provisions and goals such as The controversial artificial intelligence bill in California, SB 1047, Which was in the end Veto. However, the Senator in New York State, Andrew Gonardis, told the draft law, that he deliberately designed the Antalist so that innovation between startups or academic researchers-a joint criticism of SB 1047.

“The window that must be placed in the place of handrails is quickly shrinking, given the rapid development of this technology,” said Senator Gunares. “People who know (Amnesty International) say these risks are likely to be (…) to be worrying.”

The Rising Law is now heading to the office of the New York Governor Cathy Hochol, where the bill can either be signed in the law, send it again to amendments, or completely veto them.

If entry into a law, the New York Safety Bill in New York will require the world’s largest artificial intelligence laboratories to publish comprehensive safety and security reports on AI border models. The draft law also requires that reporting of safety accidents, such as the behavior of the artificial intelligence model or the bad actors that steal the artificial intelligence model, if they occur. If technology companies fail to raise the level of these standards, the law of lifting enables the New York Public Prosecutor to lift civil sanctions of $ 30 million.

The law of raising aims to regulate the largest companies in the world – whether it is based in California (such as Openai and Google) or China (such as Deepseek and alibaba). The requirements of transparency in the bill apply to companies that have been trained in artificial intelligence models using more than $ 100 million in computing resources (apparently, more than any Amnesty International model available today), and is provided to New York residents.

Silicon Valley greatly regained the draft safety intelligence law in New York, the New York State Assembly Council and a co -sponsorship of the Rise Alex Bores Law told Techcrunch. Bores described the resistance of the industry not surprising, but claimed that the law of raising will not limit the innovation of technology companies in any way.

Anthropor, AI Laboratory, which focuses on safety He called for federal transparency standards for artificial intelligence companies Earlier this month, it did not reach an official position on the bill, as co -founder Jack Clark said in a Friday Post on X. However, Clark expressed some grievances about the extent of the extent of the rise of the law, noting that it may pose a threat to “smaller companies”.

When asked about the criticism of the anthropologist, Senator Gonardis told Techcrunch that he believed that he was “missing the mark,” noting that he designed the draft law not to progress to small companies.

Openai, Google and Meta did not respond to the Techcrunch request for comment.

Another common criticism of the lifting law is that the developers of artificial intelligence models simply will not provide the most advanced artificial intelligence models in New York State. This was a similar criticism against SB 1047, which is largely played in Europe thanks to the difficult regulations for the continent on technology.

Assemblymember Bores Techcrunch told the regulatory burden of a relatively light lifting law, and therefore, technology companies should not be required to stop operating their products in New York. Looking at the fact that New York has the third largest GDP in the United States, withdrawing from the state is not something that most companies will take.

“I do not want to reduce the political joy that may occur, but I am very confident that there are no economic reasons because their models are not available in New York.”