NATO cannot hide the ordeal of Ukraine

Photo of author

By [email protected]


Open the newsletter to watch the White House for free

“My father’s house”, the White House announced, praising Donald Trump’s return from the NATO summit last week. This post on social media was a reference-simultaneously and ridiculous-to the title that Trump granted by Mark Retty, NATO Secretary-General. Rott may lead to its self is a little price to pay to keep the alliance together. European leaders appear to be widely satisfied, after the first NATO summit in Trump’s second state.

The US President’s fears of the summit – or even the same coalition – did not come. All European NATO members are now adhered to spend 5 percent of GDP to defense – widely defined.

A European leader lists three major achievements from the summit. First, NATO re -focused on its main mission – to deter Russia. Second, the coalition is due to cold defense spending levels, in response to the continued accumulation of Russia’s military. Third, with high European defense spending, NATO will become a more balanced alliance between the United States and Europe.

The fact that the NATO summit occurred after the American military strikes on Iran also changed the atmosphere. Trump has arrived in a good mood – and his willingness to bomb Ford Iran’s nuclear site calming European concerns that he will always be ashamed to use force. Trump was also friendly interview With Volodymyr Zelenskyy from Ukraine, he repaired some of the damage that occurred after the two leaders at the catastrophic White House meeting in February.

But while things are going well for Ukraine diplomat, the war itself seems worse. Some NATO leaders fear that the situation on the front lines may determine seriously by this fall. This will be much more important than any paper obligations made in my NATO clothes last week. Military assessments indicate that both Russian and Ukrainian armies are close to the point of exhaustion. But although Russia can maintain the current level of operations for another year, Ukraine may reach the point of collapse within six months – if it does not receive a large new military support.

In the wake of the positive Zelensyy-Trump meeting, there are hopes that Ukraine will receive new supplies from Defense systems in the United States from the United States, as well as Himars Artillery. As the air defenses in Ukraine extend, the patriots are urgently needed. However, as it was always, Trump was mysterious about providing new munitions – and could change his opinion or forget easily.

There is also some deficiency – especially in the numbers of Ukrainian forces – that Western allies in the country cannot reform. Russia is now believed to have lost more than a million soldiers, who were killed or wounded, in the conflict. But the Ukrainian losses were heavy, and Russia’s population is about four times greater than Ukraine.

Increase Russian density Missile attacks Ali Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities also destroy Ukrainian morale. Without a clear vision of victory – or at least the end of the war – the feeling of despair risks landing in the country.

The change in the mood within the Ukrainian government is reflected in the urgency that it now calls for a ceasefire. A year or two, these calls were a defeat. Now they are made of increased insistence in closed doors meetings between Ukrainian and Western leaders.

But there is little belief among European policy makers that Russia is in any mood to agree to a ceasefire. One of the officials in a good position believes that the central goal of Russia now is to seize Odessa-which Vladimir Putin considers a historic Russian city. Without Odesa, Ukraine will lose access to its main port.

A group of former European leaders – including Karl Bilde from Sweden and Sana Marin from Finland – visited Ukraine recently and chose the deteriorating mood. They wrote after that “While the Ukrainians will never stop resistance, without more military support, Ukraine can lose more lands. More cities may be arrested.” Outside of the record, some Western officials are more severe, and they warn of the danger of “catastrophic failure”, if the Ukrainian army is extended to the point of collapse – and does not receive a significant increase in military and financial aid from its Western allies.

Of course, wars are unpredictable and mood can be transformed. Some in the West argue that Ukraine can keep alone next year. They claim that despite the tremendous efforts and losses, Russia only succeeded in capturing 0.25 percent of Ukrainian territory over the past year. Optimists argue that the experience of the Ukrainians in the drone warfare made it impossible for large groups of Russian forces to collectively advance. They also argue that – even if Russia penetrates the Ukrainian lines – it lacks mechanical divisions to take advantage of the achievement.

It has been proven that the wisdom received is wrong several times before in this war. But if the growing pessimism between those who follow the Ukraine war is closely justified, then any feelings of feeling satisfied by the NATO summit may disappear soon. NATO Secretary -General is known for its optimistic nature and permanent smile. But even Roiti can struggle to maintain a smile by the end of the year.

[email protected]



https://www.ft.com/__origami/service/image/v2/images/raw/https%3A%2F%2Fd1e00ek4ebabms.cloudfront.net%2Fproduction%2Fe70a6d07-4b39-4f54-9a16-238bee444a76.jpg?source=next-article&fit=scale-down&quality=highest&width=700&dpr=1

Source link

Leave a Comment