Migrants in the United States lose the appeal against deportation to South Sudan Donald Trump News

Eight migrants in the United States have lost a recent attempt to avoid deportation to southern Sudan, a country facing continuous criticism for human rights violations.

On Friday, Judge Brian Murphy, from Boston, denied the appeal at eleven o’clock, which was the subject of a wave of legal activity throughout the day.

He argued that repeated efforts during President Donald Trump’s reign to deport men to South Sudan were “unintended punishment.” He pointed out that the United States constitution prohibits “a harsh and unusual punishment.”

In the past, the US State Department accused southern Sudan of “the killings outside the judiciary, enforced disappearance, torture, and cases of harsh, inhuman and degrading treatment.” No American citizen is advised to travel there due to a continuous armed conflict.

But the United States Supreme Court has twice that the Trump administration can already deport men into countries outside their homelands. Its last decision was issued on Thursday.

The US Department of Justice indicated that the eight men were transferred to South Sudan by 7 pm US time (23:00 GMT) on Friday. They were accused of countries such as Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Myanmar, Sudan and Vietnam.

The last appeal was submitted on Thursday evening, shortly after the Supreme Court was submitted resolution.

Initially, the case was appointed to the American boycott judge, Randolf Moss, in Washington, DC, who indicated that he was sympathetic to the request of the two deportees.

And he ordered for a short period that the deportation be stopped until 4:30 pm Each time (20:30 GMT), but in the end, he decided to transfer the case to Murphy, the judge who Decisions Help return the rulings of the Supreme Court.

Murphy was previously I released the restrictions Against deportation to South Sudan, which led to successful calls from the Trump administration. Meanwhile, the eight men were held at a military base in Djibouti, while the courts decided their fate.

Before the case was transferred to Murphy, Judge Mousse said that the fun could prove their case that the Trump administration aims to subjugate them to abuse.

Moss said during the session: “It seems to me that the US government is almost self -evident that the United States government cannot take humans and send them to conditions in which their physical well -being is simply in danger, either to punish them or send a signal to others,” Moss said during the session.

Meanwhile, the Trump administration lawyers have argued that the continuous delay in deportation would commit to relations with countries ready to accept migrants from other countries.

Murphy, who denied a request on Friday had previously sentenced the deportees, issued a judicial order against his removal to South Sudan and their saying the right to compete for deportation based on fears of their safety.

supreme court I raised the dysentery first On June 23, her ruling was made again on Thursday, with a hidden reprimand to Judge Murphy.

The Trump administration was pushing for rapid removal operations as part of its mass deportation campaign, one of the priorities of President Trump’s signature.

Opponents have accused human rights administration of people who have no documents to achieve their goals, including the right to legal procedures due under the law.

However, the Trump administration framing the undocumented immigration as a “invasion” constitutes the national security crisis, and argued that its strong efforts are necessary to expel criminals.

The eight immigrants are to be sent to South Sudan, He saidThey were “barbarians, illegal foreign criminals.” He added that they were convicted of crimes, including first -class killing, theft and sexual assault.

“These patients will be in southern Sudan by the Independence Day,” internal security spokeswoman, Tricia McLeulin, said in a press statement on Thursday.