Meta will launch societal notes in the United States next week

Next week, Meta will start one of the most important repairs in the company ever, how it divides information on its platforms.

On March 18, Meta will start releasing its version of Notes Community for Facebook, Instagram and Threads users in the United States. The program copies the collective fact examination system that was revealed by Twitter in 2021 and became the only way to correct misleading information after Elon Musk turned the platform into X.

Meta executives say they focus on obtaining community observations in the United States directly before the advantage revolves around other countries. It is a high -risk region to test a major new feature, given that the United States is the most profitable Meta market, but Meta may be hesitant in offering community observations in other regions such as the European Union, where the European Commission is currently Investigation of X on the effectiveness of its community’s observations feature.

This step can also indicate Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, to recover the Trump administration, which has already been He criticized the definition of censorship of conservative views.

Zuckerberg announced for the first time these changes In January As part of a wider effort to give oxygen to more views on its platforms. Since 2016, Meta has relied on the third -party facts to verify information on its platforms, but Neil Pots, Vice President of Public Policy in Meta, told the reporters in a briefing on Wednesday that the regimes were very biased, insufficiently developed, and made many mistakes.

For example, Potts said that Meta applied the wrong facts examination stickers An article on climate change This appeared in Fox News and Wall Street. In another case, Zuckerberg recently said on Podcast Joe Rogan that Meta should not be Fears about Covid-19 vaccines were rejected as wrong information.

Meta hopes that the community’s notes deals with the general perception of being biased, mistaken than errors, and providing a more fact -verifying system that ultimately addresses more wrong information. However, Meta notes that this system does not replace the standards of society – the rules of the company that dictates whether the publications are considered hate speech, fraud or other prohibited content.

Moderate repair comes in Meta content at a time when many technology companies are trying to address historical biases against conservatives. X led industry efforts, as Elon Musk claimed its social platform center on “freedom of expression”. Openai recently announced that it was changing how to train artificial intelligence models Embrace “intellectual freedomHe said he would work not to monitor certain views.

Rachel Lambert, Director of Products Management at Meta, said on Wednesday that Mita is based on her new system that studies the facts from open source X algorithms on community observations.

I opened dead Contribution applications in the community notes network In February. Meta shareholders will be able to suggest notes that the claims directly to verify the facts in a Facebook, Instagram or Threads. Other shareholders will then evaluate a note that they are useful or unhelpful, and partially determines whether the community note will appear to other users.

It is very similar to the X’s System, the Notes Community system in Meta evaluates the shareholders who usually do not agree to the publications. Using this information, Meta will only show a note whether the aspects that usually oppose each other agree that a useful note.

Even if the majority of contributors to Meta believe that there is a need for societal observation, this does not mean that one is offered. Moreover, Meta says it will not publish a publication or account in its algorithms even if a societal note is shown in the post.

For years, collective systems such as Notes Community have been considered promising solutions to process wrong information on social media, but they have defects.

On the positive side, the researchers found that people tend to see societal observations more worthy of confidence than flags than my chapters of third party facts, according to a study published in the magazine sciences.

In another wide -ranging study on the X facts examination system, researchers with Luxembourg University I found that the publications with their associated community notes reduced the spread of 61 % misleading posts, on average.

But many publications do not get related notes, or take a long time. Since X, they soon ask society notes to reach consensus between shareholders who have opposition views, this means that only facts are added after a publication has reached thousands or millions of people.

The University of Luxembourg University also found that society’s observations may be very slow to interfere in the early and largest stage of the post.

A recent study of Center for Digital Hate Advice It highlights the mystery. The researchers took a sample of publications containing wrong information in the elections on X and found that the shareholders suggested accurate and related information about these publications 81 % of the time.

However, among those publications that received suggestions, only 9 % received consensus among shareholders, which means that the vast majority of these publications did not appear with any real checks.