Meta tells the Supervisory Council that it does not remove the word “transgender” from the rules of hate speech

If anyone holds hope that the Supervisory Council will provide a kind of examination on Meta Re -writing the policy of hate speechMeta has just made it clear where you stand exactly. Company Published Its official response to the council’s criticism, and refused to adhere to any fundamental steps to change its rules.

The Supervision Council previously criticized that Meta policy in January “was” changing in January “as” “HurryHe wrote that he was “concern” about the company’s decision to use the term “transgender” in it Rewriting Community standards. The company’s policy, which was announced by Mark Zuckerberg in January shortly before President Donald Trump took office now allows people to claim that gay people are gay patients.

“We allow allegations of mental illness or anomalies when they are based on sex or sexual orientation, given the political and religious discourse about transgender and homosexuality and non -bilateral use of words such as” Gharib “, as the policy says now. In a decision related to videos depicting the general harassment of sexually transgender women, the Supervision Council stood up to Meta on its decision to leave videos. But the council recommended that the definition remove the word” converted ” Sexually “from its policy.

Human rights groups said that the word has a long link to discrimination and a human being from humanity. Human Rights Campaign male The term is “socially and scientifically valid” and “it is often used by anti -jacket activists to remove legitimacy from transgender people.” Jalaa has the same male “Framing the identity of a transgender person as a concept or” ideology “reduces the basic identity to an opinion that can be discussed, and thus justifies the removal of humanity, discrimination and violence in the real world against transgender people, and non -corresponding people between the sexes.

In her official response, Meta officials said they are still “feasible assessment” to remove the word from its policies. The company said that it “will consider ways to update terms”, but added that “achieving clarity and transparency in our general interpretations may sometimes require an inclusion of a language that is insulting to some.”

Meta also refused to abide by the other three council recommendations in the case. The Council has recommended that policy and implementation updates negatively affect LGBTQIA rights, including the palace, especially when these population is in a growing danger, “taking steps to alleviate these risks and issue regular reports to the council and the public for its work.

It has also been recommended that Meta allow users to appoint other individuals who are able to report bullying and harassment on their behalf, and that the company improves errors when people report bullying and harassment. Mita said it was “feasibility assessment” of these suggestions.

The Meta response raises uncomfortable questions about the amount of effects that the independent supervision council can be on the outsatically. Zuckerberg said that Meta has created the Supervision Council so that it does not have to make subsequent political decisions on its own. Previously, the social network asked the Board of Directors to assist in major decisions, such as Donald Trump’s comment and its rules for celebrities and politicians. But Zuckerberg’s decision to decline protection from hate speech and abandoning the facts of the third party took the council by surprise.

She has always been free to ignore the recommendations of the Supervisory Council, but allowed her to influence some of its most controversial policies. This seems to be changing, however. Zuckerberg’s decision was taken to decline the protection of hate speech and abandon the facts of the third party from the council. It seems that the company now has a great interest in communicating with the Board’s criticism of these changes.