The scene of artificial intelligence, which is once characterized by cooperative innovation, has turned significantly into a comprehensive war of the highest talent. At the forefront of this new aggressive era, Mark Zuckerberg’s descriptive platforms stand, where he organized an unprecedented attack on the Openai competitor. This is not just a recruitment campaign; It is a clear announcement of the war, fueled by an amazing offer of $ 300 million, designed to dismantle the essence of its competitor.
Wall Street Journal Reporting Meta is largely hanging wage packages to redefine the concept of “signature bonus”. For more than ten most amazing minds in Openai, this offer is a proposal to change life, as up to $ 100 million in the first year alone, and may escalate to $ 300 million over a period of four years. These, completely literally, the most extreme financial incentives in the history of technology, are designed not only to attract individuals, but to systematically weaken. The ultimate goal: hunting in the same minds behind the leading artificial intelligence systems such as GPT (the training transformer before training, and a type of the great language model capable of understanding and generating a human -like text) and accelerating Meta’s ambitious dream of achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI), a level of AI capable of performing any intellectual task.
When contacting him by Gizmodo, a Meta spokesman referred to the comments made by CEO Mark Zuckerberg last week during an interview with information. When asked if it was precise that Meta spends up to $ 100 million or 200 million dollars on the boots of the recruits, Zuckerberg replied, “So see, I mean, that many of the details that were reported are not accurate by themselves, but it is a very hot market. He added,” There is just an absolute allowance for the best and the most talented people. “
Openai
The influence on Openai was immediate and severe, which led to what many now call “the depletion of $ 300 million brains.” As Gizmodo was previously reported, Openai was forced to press the panic button, and wrestle with a large migration of senior researchers. Meta’s unjust hunting volume became so annoying that Openai had to close the operations for a whole week. This sharp action was taken to stop the bleeding and reorganize it in the face of this acquisition of aggressive talents. The main numbers, architects in the most advanced Openai models, have suddenly faced very profitable offers to reject them, leaving holes in the company’s research and development teams. Now, the full range of this pressure is clear: Zuckerberg not only attracts researchers; It offers them the wealth of generations, and mainly changes their financial future.
Play the calculated energy from Meta
This aggressive maneuver indicates a coordinated force aimed at the interior Openai cavity. The magazine’s report highlights that Meta extends these wages that are divided even because it is struggling to fill the decisive role of senior scholars in its artificial intelligence department. Despite months of communication, the company still lacks the single leader to lead its ambitions in AGI. However, this was not a dead from trying to get the best talent for everyone. This narration exceeds just a competitive employment; It is an unprecedented story of escalation. Meta seeks to achieve intelligence – the most intelligent machines of humans and able to outperform human intelligence in almost every field – by overfishing individuals who have built the most advanced Openai systems. It seems that the strategy is to provide money at the loyalty level without a clear leader or a completely specific plan, as it works on the hypothesis that if enough individuals are collected from IQ in one building, AGI will definitely follow.
Ethics of severe incentives
It may be working. Openai’s journeys have not ended, and the inner mood has turned from challenge to awe. Openai bleeds talent at a pace that can reshape the entire artificial intelligence scene.
But Meta’s aggressive maneuvering raises a deep question for the future of artificial intelligence: Can you really buy a genius, or are you just hiring it? While Meta acquires immediate access to unparalleled experience and accelerates its artificial intelligence aspirations, the long -term effects are complicated. The company’s culture is not bought, its difference synergy, and the organic development of leading ideas easily. There is a great risk that such extremist financial incentives, despite their short -term effectiveness, may unintentionally enhance a mercenary environment instead of being really innovative.
See Zuckerberg Grand Ai
For Zuckerberg, this is a clear and strategic play to quickly close the gap with Openai and Google in the harsh artificial intelligence race. By overcoming individuals responsible for developments that put Openai at the forefront, Meta aims to obtain talents, but also invaluable institutional knowledge, proven methodologies, and perhaps even part of the unfinished “magic” that prompted Openai. Zuckerberg strategy reflects how startups are often chasing: If a researcher does not get there, perhaps the next will. If it is not possible to secure the chief scientist, the field may be simply exceeding until one appears. The basic logic is simple: build the smartest team in the world, push them more than anyone else at all, and their mission to chase artificial intelligence at the level of God.
However, the building of Superintligence is a completely different endeavor from the expansion of the social media application, and the Meta spending comes with inherent risks. Driving $ 100 million on an individual is not the same as cultivating a coherent culture, creating a unified vision, or developing a coordinated research road. Without strong scientific leadership, the laboratory risks a transformation into an attractive vanity and conflicting business schedules.
An existential crisis for Openai
For openai, the risks are not less than existentialism. This battle is not only about who builds the next pioneering artificial intelligence model; It relates to those who will control the future of artificial intelligence. Just a year ago, Openai stood as an undisputed leader in this field. Today, Meta takes advantage of its huge financial power to systematically dismantle this.
Zuckerberg publicly stated his ambition that Meta be the company that “gets AGI”. It seems that this vision begins to possess leading talents, and therefore, breaking the institution that I visited for the first time.
https://gizmodo.com/app/uploads/2024/08/samaltman.png
Source link