Megan Markle describes the “dual standards” in the royal family

Journalist Brioni GordonA close friend Megan MarkleI criticized the “double standards” of the royal family, in contrast to the Duchess and Prince Andrew They are treated.

Megan’s warmth in their first meeting and their ongoing friendship, and wondering why simple procedures, such as emails in the early morning, have been criticized.

Quoted from a book claiming Prince Harry Once Andrew physically faced statements about Megan Markle, Gordon expressed his frustration with the difference in how to treat the royal family.

Journalist and Podixter Brioni Gordon, a long -term friend of Meghan, spoke against what she describes as “ridiculous double standards” within the British royal family.

Gordon, who first met the Duchess of Sussex in 2018, said that Megan faced a more severe audit than the other upper celibacy family, as they attracted a pointed comparison with how Prince Andrew was treated.

Writing in Daily MailShe wondered: “Can you blame the spouses for his desire to escape from a distinguished prison for royal life, especially given the funny double standards applied to the Duchess of Sussex and Prince Andrew?”

With their initial meeting at the event of a royal institution, where she was hosting a mental health committee, Gordon said that Megan put her immediately.

“She gave me the hug of the big old bear, the type that makes you feel comfortable – especially when it is presented to a diverse Asian family in front of photographers from Baying.”

According to Gordon, “Megan’s behavior to Earth” has worked like Sahar, which removed all the anxiety I felt myself and the presence of others.

Gordon has shared that her friendship with Megan did not end yet seven years ago.

Since then, they met with lunch meals, cooperated in charitable initiatives, and even spent time in Frozemore Cottage, the former Sasis house, who were finally asked to evacuate. Megan also visited at her residence in Monteesito, California.

Thinking about their conversations and their common moments, Gordon admitted that she was often contradictory to the public perception.

She wrote: “Every time we meet, or we exchange texts about life, I wonder what you say about the world to the point that they can be defamed and hunting, while it seems that members of the royal family have obtained a free permit to act badly as they want.”

Gordon noted that one of these characters is Prince Andrew, the subject of Andrew Loni’s recent biography, “Bat: The rise and fall of York’s house.”

The book includes a series of damned allegations, among them a claim that the Duke of York has benefited from an employee in the palace, describing them as a “F-CKING” for his failure to use the full title of the mother queen.

Gordon admitted that she was “organized” by revealing the book about Prince Andrew, but said they were only deeply frustrated.

“With all harsh allegations, it became more angry and more angry that it has not been done much to help Megan because she is struggling with life in the royal family, while a lot was done to protect Prince Andrew.”

She wondered how Megan could be distorted for a relatively simple behavior, such as sending employees emails at 5 am, while others have faced little accountability.

“In some way, Andrew moved away from it for decades, while Megan was carrying a” difficult duchess “mark at the moment when she asked the queen if she might be able to borrow a crown to attend her wedding.”

Her central question remained, “Why do people tolerate all kinds of wrong behavior such as strong men such as Prince Andrew, but not a woman, according to critics, has a habit of sending an email to her employees at 5 am?”

According to Lownie’s biography, Harry once faced Andrew physically due to alleged statements about Megan, a demand for Harry’s rejection categorically.