Mark Zuckerberg wants to win Amnesty International by copying everyone more intelligent than him

Mark Zuckerberg’s favorite step? Copy, hunting, repeat. He made him one of the richest people on this planet. Now, he is deviating from this playing book for his biggest challenge so far: the artificial intelligence race.

Meta, the company that stands behind Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, works to employ and buy a boom, and throw water amounts in the best researchers of artificial intelligence and emerging companies in a recent attempt to catch the country of Okay and Google and remaining competitors such as Depsic. It is a full skill printing press to persuade the world of technology and investors that Meta is still important in the artificial intelligence race.

But this is an evolution: Zuckerberg is the hands of everyone.

Moves

In the past few weeks, the Zuckerberg Ai team:

• A talent is like Alexander Wang (co -founder of Scale AI) to lead the new SuperINGENGENCE unit Amnesty International
• It offered 100 million dollars+ packages for the best researchers in Openai and Google (many said no), according to an executive at Openai.
• Emerging companies picked up or tried – from Scale AI to Playai, which reproduces human sounds of natural conversations
• I spoke with artificial intelligence columns such as artificial intelligence, and Ribaway, and even safe Superinmence

To date, a dead dead has given several big names: Lucas Bayer, Alexander Collesnikov, Xiaoa Chi (formerly Openai), and others like Trapit Bansal and Jack Rae, who left Google DeepMind. According to what was reported, the company (and failed) tried to attract prominent artificial intelligence researchers such as Nam Brown from Openai and Cory Kavukcuoglu from Google.

The task of the unit? To build artificial intelligence systems more intelligent than humans. Yes, really.

This is the Zuckerberg version of Thanos Snap: Collecting Stone, picking up his fingers, and he will himself to the front of the artificial intelligence line.

Throwing money in the future

Zuckerberg is also throwing money in startups. Meta has invested $ 14.3 billion of artificial intelligence, and she is holding Playai, which has evolved human audio agents. There were also feelings that were sent to Superstins, Amna Squisfar, and new laboratory thinking machines in Mira Moratti.

If it seems as if Zuckerberg buys panic on its way through the Amnesty International Mall before the shelves are empty, then this is a type.

Meta’s Ai, Meta Ai, is not currently matching with the GPT-4O from Openai, Google Gemini 2.5 Pro or Deepseek’s R1. These models can cause. It can be a metastatic response. It is like asking a young child to give up the chess master.

This is the problem: Meta does not just want to catch up with the knees; She wants to jump. Zuckerberg knows that he cannot wait for years for local breakthroughs. So he does what he always did better: copying, buying and expanding its scope quickly.

It is the playback book on Facebook again. Stories, rollers, topics: all reefs on competing ideas. Now, Amnesty International.

Risk

Why does it matter?

Dead in the artificial intelligence race. Time. Tools such as Chatgpt, Gemini and Deepseek’s R1 can cause, planning and solving problems. Date of artificial intelligence? He still plays to catch up with the knees, and is better in a small conversation than solving real problems.

What is the goal of Zuckerberg?

Build the artificial intelligence that it can think about and the reason, like the best Openai and Google, and do it quickly enough to stay related to the intelligence arms race.

Why now?

Next Openai models are about to move to the source. It can erase the last Meta feature: the free Amnesty International Models open to developers.

Zuckerberg announced in 2025 years of artificial intelligence. It should be. The company’s advertising works are offered to pressure and strings parked, and Tiktok is still eating Instagram lunch. Meanwhile, Openai is joking with becoming a full social network, threatening descriptive commandments on home grass.

The new plan is to go to “thinking agents”, artificial intelligence tools that can think through step -by -step problems, not just completing your thoughts. These agents can operate business aides, customer support robots, or even future consumer applications.

But Meta needs one thing first: actual intelligence.

Criticism

Even openai’s Sam Altman rolls his eyes. In the recent Bodcast with his brother, he said that Meta strategy is clear: “Copy Openai, try to collide with talent, and overcome everyone.” But Altman warns that copying does not build a culture of innovation, and culture is what wins in the long run.

“I heard that dead think of us as his largest competitor,” Al -Taman said to his brother. But “their current efforts of artificial intelligence did not succeed as they were hoping. I respect like aggression and continue to try new things.”

It did not stop there.

“They have started to present these giant offers for many people in our team, as you know, such as 100 million dollars signing bonuses,” adding: “It is crazy.” Meta was accused of “just an attempt to copy Openai, up to the user interface errors,” added Altman.

Even Altman called on Facebook addiction to seize attention, saying that Openai wants to be the “only technological company that does not feel rivalry”. Translation: Meta tries to penetrate your mind; We are trying to help him.

A new episode of Uncapped with Sama. Enjoy 🤗 pic.twitter.com/2IXYT3B4GM

JALTMA (JALTMA) June 17, 2025

We took

Zuckerberg has always been a quick follower, not a first engine. This is a work for social media. If history is any evidence, it will fall a few times. It is great in absorbing features, expanding rapidly, and his opponent -powerful competitors. But artificial intelligence race is different. It is about innovation. To date, the largest play of artificial intelligence in Meta is its wallet. Whether this is enough to win a race, as originality remains important as much as the fiery force remains.

Currently, Zuckerberg is betting that you cannot lose if you buy everyone who knows how to win. But in a world where artificial intelligence constitutes strength, privacy and the future of work, we all have a stake if these strategies are already producing safe or useful technology, or more noise.