Mark Wahlberg Flop was a new version of the best movie by Odere Hepburn

Photo of author

By [email protected]






“CHARADE” in Audrey Hepburn was not “Charde”, one of the best films of the actress, but it was one of the best films that came out of that whole year. It was described as “the best Hitchcock Hitchcock movie”, the film was decisive and the audience. She also won the Hipporen Award for the British Film Academy for Best Actress, and won the writer Peter Stone Award for the Edgar Alan Poe Award for Best Photo Screenplay.

The 2002 Mystery Film, “Truth About Charlie”, was a new edition of “Charde” that sought to achieve the same level of success as origin. This starred in Hipburn and Wahlberg in Cary Grant’s. Wahlberg may have a different name as a Grant, but it is written to be sneaking and charming like the role This represents the end of the era of grant. Although both Walhberg and Newton are big names at this point, the movie turned at the box office. It only achieved about $ 7 million worldwide with a budget of $ 60 million.

Part of her catastrophic performance came to casting. Just because the scenario told Wahlberg to be a magician who does not mean walberg (known as His aggressive hot charactersHe was able to withdraw the achievement off. Critics have been considered intensity, and the global photos seem to agree. They threw the movie at the end of October, within a week dominated by Halloween Celsius such as “The Ring” and “Ghost SHIP”, and of course The terrifying Ghor Festival, which was “Jagas: Film”. The studio seemed only tried to market the film, local and abroad, and by the end of the first weekend of the film in the theaters, it was already forgotten.

It is to defeat itself to compare your movie with the charger

(Demme is doing something that I have never seen by another director – it makes Paris look bad, ” Critic Josh Spiegel complained About “the truth about Charlie”. Critic Peter Rainer has become more harsh with her New York Magazine“I realize that Mark and Labrag are not Carrie Grant, but there should not be the reason for compensation for his presence in this movie?” It was the prevailing feelings, as was the critic Muira McDonald’s A more positive review“Charde” was magic; Charlie is not. ”

If the “truth about Charlie” is not sold as a new version of “Chadrad”, it may be better to receive it. Instead, she chose to compare herself to one of the most remembered films in the 1960s, which is a very good movie that Ayu Edpery chose it in it. CRETERION ClOSET chooses the video After more than 60 years. “I love stealing,” said Idbi. “When I discovered this movie, I was like,” oh, perfect, two successive people stealing. “But it is very like a very and very ridiculous and there is really fun pieces.

In 2022, the Congress Library announced that it adds “Charde” to the National Film Registry, a list aimed at preserving films that are considered “culturally, historically or aesthetically important.” Frankly, it’s time. Even the direct “Charde”, you can see the clear influence of the charming spy comedy in Paris on many European films that will come after. “Charde” definitely deserves to verify contemporary viewers, especially because it is because it is It is significantly easy to get your hands.





Source link

https://www.slashfilm.com/img/gallery/a-forgotten-mark-wahlberg-flop-was-a-remake-of-audrey-hepburns-best-movie/l-intro-1753727095.jpg

Leave a Comment