Liberal justice claims the transformed Tennsee law “irreversible damages” in the opposition

Judge Sonia Sotomoor criticized six of her colleagues supreme court In a few opposition on Wednesday to take a decision to support the Tennessee law, which prohibits specific sexual transgender medical treatments for minors.

Sotomior said that Resolution 6-3 in the United States against Scorminiti, issued along ideological lines, was incorrectly discriminated against minors based on their gender. Liberal justice took the unconventional step to read opposition from the bench.

Sotomior, who was appointed in court by former President Barack Obama, said that the majority of “refuses to summon things with their names in their real names” and “classifying sex” to allow a Tennessee draft law to bear the constitutional tests.

The Supreme Court is divided into the state’s ban on “gender transitions” for minors

“The court’s readiness to do this here is irreversible damage Equality protection condition It calls for legislative councils to engage in discrimination by concealing the flagrant sex classifications in sight, said Sotomiore. It also allows, without the second thinking, an endless harm to children, transgender, parents and families who love them. “

The case arose, which was one of the articles that the Supreme Court watched from the term of the Supreme Court, from Biden Administration A lawsuit was passed on the Tennessee invoice in 2023 to ban puberty blockers and hormonal therapy as treatments for minors who determine the transgender.

Scotus rules on the state’s ban on gender transition “treatments” for minors in the case of history

Doctors will provide such medical treatments based on a patient with sex defects. Sotomoor claims that the law prohibiting this practice requires an increased level of scrutiny that the majority of the Supreme Court did not apply.

Click here to get the Fox News app

“The majority is subject to a law that is clearly distinguished on the basis of sex just to review rationality,” Sotomior wrote. “By retracting the judicial review exactly the place that matters to more, the court abandons the transgender children and their families into political whims. In sadness, I oppose.”

The Supreme Court decision is effectively allowing the states that pass laws such as TenisiTo ban some medical treatments for minors.