Legal experts analyze the defense strategy in Didi in the case of sex crimes

decision Sean “Didi” Combs Lawyers not to contact any witnesses to testify in his federal trial of sex crimes due to the burden of prosecution of reasonable doubt, according to legal experts.

Deedy’s lawyer, Mark Agunefilo, indicated on Monday in the court that the defense was planning to review the evidence with the jury, and will not ask witnesses of martyrdom on behalf of the rapper. The rapper team expects to rest its case on Wednesday, as the closing arguments are expected to start the next day.

“The decision to contact the witnesses during the defense case is calculated or not,” the criminal defense and the civil lawyer Adanté Index From LLC lawyers, Fox News Digital told.

It is not expected that the defense of Didi will invite any witnesses in the trial of sex trafficking

“Not to call any witnesses means that the defense informs the jury mainly that no one knows it in the whole universe that can speak on behalf of Didi to help in his defense. On the other hand, witnesses can call for the opening of this person to interrogate and may raise a harmful testimony against Didi, depending on their interactions with him and their knowledge of these women.”

The indicator likened the defense decision not to call any witnesses to the “Pandora Fund”.

Given that the defense indicates that they do not intend to communicate Watch oneThey do not believe that any potential defense witnesses will lead to a clear increase in my new. His lawyers have mainly decided that the juice is not worth pressure. “

The missing witnesses and the remaining questions are the trial, where Didi trial is approaching the summary: expert

Judge Aaron Supramian Didi is likely to ask his decision not to make the situation.

The index explained: “The Deddy Stestmentive will allow the trial only to recount their case and put the previous elements of the evidence in front of the jury for the second or third time.” “The trial will have a field day that passes every video, text and issuance of a witness in the trial against him and forcing Didi to recognize the authenticity of videos, receipts and bills, and the elements that were recovered in his homes and hotel rooms, and that he was present during the events described in previous certificates.

“In light of the evidence presented in the trial, this is likely to be an interrogation and a humiliating, and the prosecutors are waiting for their entire career.”

The trial closing arguments, which started May 5 with the choice of the juryIt is expected that it will start on Thursday after Deedy’s lawyers explained that they will need only two days to defend their customers.

Trial You see Loville He told Fox News Digital that the defense wants to double the reasonable doubt, and that the “strange lifestyle” of my new life is not equal to what the prosecution was proposed, which is that “Deddy formed a criminal institution to delight itself, Tony Soprano from the child’s oil.”

Like what you read? Click here for more entertainment news

“The only reason for not calling the witnesses in your defense is if you fully think that there is a reasonable doubt, and you don’t want to do anything to heat about this, including calling your witnesses,” Loville said. “It will be logical to call a psychiatrist to explain that Cassie and Jin’s behavior reflects more for a relationship to mutual consent, based on the autonomy that every woman had, the benefits they received and the love they had for Didi.

“Moreover, it will be useful to summon the executives of Bad Boy Entertainment to remove the companies from Didi’s most personal behavior, to waste the element of the criminal institution. Finally, perhaps a legal industry or a legal expert to distinguish the aspects of” workers “in exchange for” prostitution “, to meet the charge of prostitution.”

“However, the defense felt so that the invitation of witnesses like these will have the ability to negatively affect the reasonable suspicion, and they chose not to do so,” Leville added.

Mark QutcoWho was previously leading the criminal section of the US Prosecutor’s Office in Detroit, he believed that Didi’s decision not to testify was “smart”.

“It is a great gamble to testify in such an issue, as the prosecution brought the concerns of extortion, allowing them to bring this wealth from bad acts there,” said Chutco. “By taking the situation, he would only submit himself to worse, touched actions by the court. Perhaps this was the correct call.”

Click here to register in the entertainment newsletter

“Daidi’s decision can also be considered not also smartly, because he can say in conclusion,” Look, to the jury, the prosecution was six weeks of time to show you, to try to prove their case. “This defense lawyers will say:” We have shown reasonable suspicion through our interrogation, and we do not want to waste more of your time. The jury reminds that the assumption of innocence always goes to Didi as the defendant in this case. “

Notice Chutkow how the burden of proof is on the government, not on the Bad Boy Records founder or his team.

The lawyer said: “When a case is presented, if you are on the defense side, it is better to be good, because if you fall, you return a kind of sign, and you may be in a worse position.” “Sometimes it is less than that. I know some people suggest, well, Wow, doesn’t he have something that he can put? “In some respects, it may be an opportunity for defense to say,” No, we didn’t need it. “

Witness: A legal expert explains the defense movements

With the approaching case that approaches more than seven weeks after its start, and after nine months of arrest of Didi and charged him, Shotko believed that both sides did “what they sought to achieve.”

“The prosecution was put in all the evidence. It was not excluded. Nevertheless, the defense did a good job in the interrogation,” he said. “They have brought a lot of additional contacts between Didi and these other women to show that the relationship is more complicated.

“One of the things that I think is the claim that he will have to do in the final argument is mainly to say,” See, this is not like the state of trafficking you see on TV. It is not, as she does not have the position of a person who is kidnapped and chains on the cooler on the basement.

Click here to get the Fox News app

“The other field that I think they want to emphasize is blackmail in this case. Using tapes and threatening to exposure to these tapes to make women correspond to what Didi wanted is the component of coercion itself. If you are on the side of the claim, I will search for lying evidence,” Chutkow added.

The accusation was charged With blackmail (RICO); Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion; Transfer to engage in prostitution in a federal indictment on September 17. He faces 15 years of life imprisonment if convicted. Didi maintained his innocence all the time.