Kirk Douglas Scientific flip, who completely hated Roger Ebert

Photo of author

By [email protected]






Film critics watch hundreds of films every year, and they always get a little strange when they reached a set of bad films. Therefore, it is sometimes processor to direct the individual’s frustrations on a terrible movie – especially if this film is a busy series of theaters of the cinema “Death Race” for Paul and.).

Negative reviews do not lightly illuminate, but when writing by the masters of the craft, It can be very satisfactory readings. When Pauline Kyle got from New Yorker, she could be along her length (as she did with Without the “dirty Harry”, I Revere movie) or shot a single killing (her full review of Herbert Ross’ Steel Magnolias “as follows: Roger Ebert is also practiced in Investive skill, as he explained in Epic From Herve Baloud, “Little End City, Big City” (“I hated every minute of that”).

The negative reviews of EBERT were so entertaining that he issued a group of them entitled “I hated, hated, I hated this movie.” Read its cover to cover, and it may not take a long time for Ebert to take Schalig to a movie you love or even love (it is launched with “Ace Ventura: Pet Detective”, and four entries later, tearing the flag of Louis SUBLIME B-Moner “crocodile”). But the book will be a cavity if it only strikes in low fruits, so you love it from your teeth and continue to read until you really make a movie you do.

One of the films that deservedly deserved the Ebel’s Vitriol was a science fiction movie in 1980, starring Kirk Douglas, and directed by the man who gave us “Singin” in the rain.

Ebert was not the only critic who hated Saturn 3

When “Saturn 3” passed on the theaters on February 15, 1980, it was immediately ridiculed as a torn to Ridley Scott’s “Alien”. Director Stanley Dunes claims the idea of “Alien”, which I bought because I don’t know how you can see that classic and thinking “What will be more terrifying than acid xenomorph is a fatal robot that wants to have sex with Farrah Fawcett.” I mean, that will be frightening for Mrs. Fosset. And her retreat and then a wife. Now I am thinking about the best “Saturn 3” if they incite the deadly robot for a man of $ 6 million.

“Sature 3” Stars Douglas and Fawcett as a couple of scientists at a search station around Saturn. They expect Captain James to arrive from one of the largest spaces, but instead they find themselves visiting Captain Benson (Harvey Kittel), who is mentally ill who killed James and is now eager to get Douglas character out of the image so that he can all obtain Fawism for himself. Benson also brought A robot named HectorThat are equipped with the brain tissue of human embryos. What Douglas and Josit does not realize is that Hector’s awareness has been synchronized with Benson, so what he wants, he wants. Hector is a more beneficial customer than Benson.

Saturn Ebel Nuked 3 of the orbit

EBERT review from one stars for “Saturn 3” It begins through lamenting the fact that science fiction films rarely possess the intelligence of the great novels of many kinds. He sarcained by the film to force him on the Douglas and Jose’s smart characters who are supposed to behave foolishly (they put a trap of Hector also guaranteeing their death), and they put on the ITC team produced by LORD Lew Grade and Kastner. While EBERT gives them the credit for giving us a “MUPPET movie”, it is correct that quality control is not a great concern for them (they also directed the Roman roosters such as “The Legend of the Lone Ranger”, “Escape To Athena” and Lee Majors More/”Jaws” “Fish” Killer Fish “).

EBERT begins the last paragraph of its review in this way: “This film is amazedly stupid, completely unreasonable from a scientific point of view, and a shameful waste of money.” Although Ebert was not a box office diagnosis (in fact, the spread of the box office coverage that was brought by “entertainment tonight” in the early 1980s), but it was right in “Saturn 3” as it was a bad investment. The film lasted in a total of $ 5 million for a budget of $ 10 million. If it is worth seeing today, this is dedicated to the scene that stimulates Gaffaw in Janky Hector, Keitel speaks with the voice of the actor Roy Dotrice (who was called his dialogue when the star “Mean Streets” refused to participate in the post -production episode), and Douglas, who is completely old in the fighting of the virtues.

One for EBERT is registered on “Saturn 3.” It is a terrible movie. It will come out of the copper joint “Blame on Rio.”





Source link

https://www.slashfilm.com/img/gallery/the-kirk-douglas-sci-fi-flop-that-roger-ebert-absolutely-hated/l-intro-1752185812.jpg

Leave a Comment