Chris Prat He found himself unexpectedly intertwined Katy PyreneLong -term legal battle with the veteran in the US military Carl Westcott More than $ 15 million, Monteesito Palace.
Perry and Westcott have been imprisoned in a conflict since 2020 after the veteran tried to return from the sale just two months after its approval. Despite the court ruling in December 2023, which supported the purchase law, Perry later subsequently filed a separate lawsuit seeking compensation.
Now, it is said that Chris Pratt is withdrawn to the legal battle because he rented the property from Katie Perry, and his testimony is expected to help the legal team of Karl Westkot to address many major questions related to the condition and the value of the rent for the home.
The article below the advertisement continues
Chris Pratt is seen as a “material witness” in the property dispute

Chris Pratt may soon find himself a witness in Katie Perry’s legal conflict with Karl Westcott, the old warrior from which she bought $ 15 million in Montessito in 2020.
Pratt is associated with the case because he rented the house from Perry, although it is unclear whenever the lease agreement begins.
According to a source spoke with The sun of the United StatesThe WestCott lawyers in the court last Tuesday were on this issue, and they may soon move to the summons of Chris Pratt as a “financial witness” before the case.
Al -Olafin claimed that the legal team WestCott wanted to create the schedule for the date of Prat in renting the house from Perry.
The article below the advertisement continues
In addition, they may be interested in knowing the amount of what Prat pays for rent, especially since the legal issue involves requesting damage from Westcott and claimed in its file that the house is not living.
“Perry obtained millions of dollars as compensation, and claimed that she was not suitable for live,” the informed said. ((The house) It is clear that it can live because the actor A list is rented. “
The article below the advertisement continues
Chris Pratt may be removed for three hours on the property dispute

If Prata finally received a summons from Westcott lawyers, the actor may be asked to attend a three -hour deposit.
This was revealed in the documents submitted by the WestCott team on August 1 with the Supreme Court of California.
“Now, immediately before the trial of the second stage, there is new evidence, unprecedented that Perry rented the actor Chris Pratt and his wife (Catherine Schwarzenegger)). Daily Mail An article as a guide must be allowed to deposit Prat.
The article below the advertisement continues
Lawyers of the old warriors insist on re -respecting the palace amid Chris Pratt’s use of property

The documents also revealed that the WestCott lawyers are asking the court to allow their experts to “re -check the property for three hours for three hours.”
The purpose of the visit is to “know the reforms made and clarify its reasonable value.”
According to the document, WestCott’s lawyers believe that only by conducting the re -inspection, PRATT and other parties concerned, in August can move forward based on the “real advantages” of the case.
The article below the advertisement continues
Veteran Ibn Katie Perry criticized the property dispute

Last November, Ibn Westcott moved to X to criticize Perry because of his arrival after his father, who is currently suffering from bedridden with Huntington’s disease.
“My family was in a struggle against … Katie Perry and now Orlando Bloom to defend my father’s honor, Karl Westcott, who dies from Huntington’s disease,” books at that time.
“Celebrities must end, like the political Lawfare. We cannot bear any justice from two levels in America.”
In a separate publication, WestCott claimed that Perry has a “pattern” to target people who lack resources to fight in court.
He was cited in a previous condition in which the singer sued the owner of a small company who was using the name “Katie Perry” for her fashion brand, although he was the name of the legal birth of women.
Everything about Katie Perry’s lawsuit against Karl Westcott

The legal battle between Katie Perry and Karl and Westcott began in August 2020, just one month after the sale of Montecito Palace, which has an area of 8.9 acres to the singer for $ 15 million.
At that time, the founder of 1-800 flowers filed a lawsuit against Perry in an attempt to cancel the deal, claiming that he was severely treated and not from a healthy mind when the contract occurred.
The case lasted until December 2023, when the judge stated that the agreement was valid and that WestCott was mentally qualified during the negotiations, which were held with Berry Business Manager, Bernie Godvy.
In March 2024, Perry officially received the keys of the house and shortly after its own lawsuit was filed for compensation.
The article below the advertisement continues
So far, Perry has paid $ 9 million towards property, leaving a remaining $ 6 million balance. The same amount coincides with the damage they are now seeking, with demands that structural defects, postponed maintenance, and lost rental revenues justify their request.
Source link
https://theblast.prod.media.wordpress.mattersmedia.io/brand-img/123/2338×1080/2025/07/01101733/Katy-Perry-1-scaled-e1751379507871.jpg?