Katie Perry described a “evil witch” by the disabled veteran son

Katie Perry It was called again by the family of an 85 -year -old old warrior with whom she was involved in a legal battle about selling his house in Monteto.

The pop star appeared before the court via Zoom, where she stated that she wanted “justice”. She also made many revelation about the deal, including the fact that her former fiancé, Orlando BloomIt is the original owner of the house.

Katie Perry’s statements have not sought well with the children of veteran, who have since made huge statements about the testimony of the “deceitful” singer.

Carl Westcott was not affected by the veteran war in the wandering of the observations that Katie Perry made during her last appearance before the court, as she claimed that she wanted “justice” amid the conflict of the Monteesito Palace.

In response to the singer’s comments, Chart WestCott said New York Post“It was good for her that the evil witch finally come out from the West.”

In a phone conversation with the news outlet, the Perry chart exploded, claiming that it had shown a “pattern of respect” since their legal hostility began.

He also called the virtual appearance of the singer, and aims at her clothes during her testimony.

“Then she appeared in pajamas in front of the judge. So, as you know, just a lack of respect,” said Chert. “I think (it’s) reflects how everyone sees in the world. They all, as you know, are less than her. It is not important for her. We are all just her little games to do what she wants.

He also criticized his brother, Berry, saying that he found her “calculated and reel” and her testimony to be “stored.”

“Roar” Hitmaker bought Montecito in July 2020 from WestCott, where she initially wanted a family to start with her at the time, Orlando Bloom, there.

However, the patient’s veteran tried to cancel the deal, claiming that he is mentally impotent. But a judge eventually stood up to Perry, saying that Westcott was a sound mind while negotiating the agreement.

Then Perry followed Sue WestCott again, asked to get $ 6 million of damage, and claimed that $ 3 million would cover her loss in rental revenues.

Since then, they have been going back and forth without any friendly solution on the horizon.

Perry witnessed in the Los Angeles Supreme Court on Tuesday before Judge Joseph Levinner. During the court session on Tuesday, Perry was interrogated by Westcott lawyer Andrew Thomas.

When the singer asked if she had anything that she earns from the result of her legal action against the disabled veteran, she said: “Yes, justice.”

Then the “California Gurls” makers explained that she would lose a lot of financial aspect depending on the results of the litigation, and highlighting the “lawyers” and “income” fees from rents.

At some point during her testimony, Perry seemed to forget the number of houses she owned after interrogation by Westcott lawyer about her real estate portfolio before “concluding a contract” to buy the veteran house.

According to reports, she said: “Three houses, I don’t remember if it is three – there may be more.”

When she was asked to clarify, Perry stated, “I owned, now after I went back, I owned three homes to house my family … in Santa Barbara province.”

Perry added that her business manager, Bernie Godvy, signed the deal to buy Westcott’s house, but she was aware of everything, as she saw and “loved” the property before making a offer.

Previous reports had apparently included Perry that was the owner and actual buyer of the property, but the disclosure of the new court indicates that she actually belonged to her previous letter, Orlando Bloom.

WestCott lawyer, Thomas, pressed Perry about the acquisition of the property, and asks whether “the title has been inserted as a company called Dove B LLC,” the singer replied, “Yes, sir.”

“Bernie Godvy witnessed this is the case. Is it true that DVE B LLC is the company Orlando Bloom?” Thomas, who replied, said, “It’s one of his LLCS.”

Then the lawyer asked: “So when the home title was transferred as a result of this lawsuit, he never went to you or any entity you control, isn’t this true?” “Yes, sir.”