Kansas filed a lawsuit with the law to cancel the end -of -life options for a pregnant woman

Three women and two doctors are sustaining to prevent a Kansas Law This nullifies the advanced medical guidance of a pregnant woman about treatment at the end of life.

One of them is currently pregnant – a constitutional condition in the state’s natural death law, which deprives pregnant women of the option to provide advanced directives to accept or reject health care if they are permanently incapable or sick.

Patient Patient Emma Vernon, Abejil Ottawi, Laura Straton, and the doctor, Michelle Bennett and Linley Holman The lawsuit filed Thursday. And it argues that the item violates the right to personal independence, privacy, equal treatment and freedom of expression by ignoring the end of life decisions for pregnant women.

The Center for Disease Control removes the recommendation of the Covid vaccine for healthy and pregnant mothers

Vernon, a pregnant prosecutor, wrote a pre -direction of health care stating that if she is pregnant and with a peripheral condition, she only wants to obtain a sustainable life for life if “there is a reasonable medical certainty” her child will reach a full period and generate “with a meaningful possibility of a sustainable life and without important conditions that would weaken the quality of his life significantly.”

The lawsuit says that its guidance was not “given the same respect that the law provides to others who complete the directives due to the exclusion of pregnancy, and therefore it does not benefit from the same level of certainty that the guidance provides otherwise.”

All states have laws that allow people to write pre -directions on the medical care they want to obtain if they cannot make their health decisions. Nine states, including Kansas, have a sentence to nullify a Carrier Prior direction.

Doctors who joined the lawsuit said that the law requires them to provide pregnant patients with Less care level Other patients open them to civil and criminal lawsuits as well as professional penalties.

The lawsuit says that doctors “are deeply committed to the basic medical principle of that patients have a basic right to determine the treatment they receive, and that providing treatment without the enlightened patient approval violates both medical ethics and the law.”

A new mother is angry for the husband to choose friends and barbecue on her and for their birth

Click here to get the Fox News app

However, Kansas law forces them to ignore their patients who clearly expressed the end of life, forcing them to provide their pregnant patients with less care standards than any of their other patients, “continues. “It requires this decreasing care without providing any clarity regarding the final treatment that they must provide-which leads to guessing what the law expects while exposing the civil, criminal and professional consequences of its mistake.”

The defendant in the lawsuit is the Public Prosecutor in Kansas Chris Kobech, Chairman of the Kansas State Council for the Arts, Richard Bradbury, and the lawyer of Douglas Dakota Lomes.