Justin’s call to inferred the dismissal of Taylor Swift refused in court

Denial Justin BalouniRequest an extension to drop it Taylor Swift In the federal lawsuit against Blake Blake.

According to the documents obtained by US weekly On Friday, September 12, the American boycott judge Luis Lehman He spent Balouni, 41, and his legal team “has not proven a good reason for his required extension. The only justification they provided for the extension is to confirm that the previous professional obligations in Swift are now preventing them from appearing to be deposited before October 20, 2025.”

“Wayfarer parties have not made any discussion about when they started an attempt to scope. The discovery was continuing in this case for about six months,” Lean said to Baldoni production company, Wayfarer Studios, saying that “Wayfarer parties have not made any discussion about when they started an attempt to scope. The discovery was continuing in this case for about six months.”

The judge continued, “The parties to Wayfarer previously asked to depose Swift in May 2025 before they eventually pulled out a humiliating order.

In conclusion, Lehman issued a decree, “after she failed to show appropriate care, the required extension is rejected.”

we I mentioned earlier Baldouni lawyers presented a letter on Thursday, September 11, claiming this Fast “agreed” to take off Next month. They mentioned that The deposit will take place from October 20 to October 25, and request an extension on the deadline for dropping third parties to allow them time to speak with the 35 -year -old pop star.

Levli team Respond By claiming that in the past “he sought repeatedly to bring (fast) in this litigation to feed their media strategy that is unavoidable.”

They stated, “In this regard, (with the one and his team) is lacking care, lack of respect for privacy and timeline (rapid), amazing.”

Friday, Swift’s lawyer Reward a claim of the blogging She agreed to deposit.

As the party’s lawyer knows, since the beginning of this matter, we have constantly confirmed that my client has no material role in this procedure, “Swift’s legal team stated in a letter obtained by we.

“Moreover, my client did not agree to the deposit, but if I was forced to do so, we advised (after hearing it for the first time about the deposit just three days ago) that its schedule would accommodate the time required during the October 20 week if the parties can resolve their disputes,” which was directed to the LIMAN. “We do not take any role in those conflicts.”

The Swift team previously dealt with the legal hostility of LVLE/Baldoni in March, when it canceled the one who was worried about it.

Swift delegate at that time stated that she had not been drank in the film at the case center – End with usAnd that had been borne in the inferiority and vitality – and had no knowledge of the conflict.

“Taylor Swift did not go ahead with the collection of this film, she was not involved in any initial or creative decisions, you did not record the movie, and you never saw any notes on the movie, you didn’t even see End with us Even weeks of its general launch, and he was traveling all over the world during the years 2023 and 2024 they top the largest tour of history. ”

Fif up a lawsuit against Baldoni in December 2024, claiming sexual harassment of the film collection he directed. It also claimed that he coordinated with the public relations team to launch a distortion campaign against it, which he implemented. Then she filed a lawsuit against Livly and her husband Ryan ReynoldsAccusing a couple of extortion and defamation, but this lawsuit was He refused in June.