Judge Ilon Musk, Wissam Altman, accuses the “ingenuity” in court

Elon Musk scored a small victory in the court on Tuesday in his case against Sam Al -Taman, but the judge was not admired by the tactics of either side, and reprimanding them because of the “games”.

American judge, iPhone Gonzalez Rogers, called for “calling both sides” to “excessive and repeat the case” repeatedly. “

This is the latest in the continuous Musk hostility with Altman. Musk originally The lawsuit filed Last year in a federal court in North California, accusing Altman and Openai of fraud. Musk claims that it was misleading in the founding and financing of Openai in 2015 under the belief that it will remain non -profit.

The lawsuit claims that Altman built a secret network from OpenAi -profit companies, controlled a non -profit board of directors, participated in self -dealing, transforming non -profit talent and technology to achieve financial gains. The lawsuit says that the resulting corporate structure is now worth an estimated $ 100 billion.

The framework for the argument of Musk as “the story of a textbook for altruism in exchange for greed”. It is worth noting that Musk dropped a similar suit against Openai earlier last year.

The Altman team responded by submitting 55 positive batch, as it presented new facts that were not mentioned in the original Musk complaint. In December Blog postOpenai claimed that when Musk was still with the organization, he really wanted to become a profit with himself on his head.

On Tuesday, Judge Gonzalez Rogers reduced the list consisting of 55 batch, and they judge that some are “unrelated, extra, insufficient or improper.” MUSK’s legal team also criticized his attempt to hit all defenses, saying they failed to “take the high land.” Instead, the judge reduced the defenses by 16, leaving 39 in the case. Judge Gonzalez Rogers wrote: “The court will not waste precious judicial resources on the parties.”

“The Openai’s strategy of land distraction is wearing thin on everyone,” Moussable’s main lawyer in the case said in an e -mail statement to Gismino. “We look forward to prosecuting this issue on real issues: the constant fraud of Openai and the complete betrayal of its charitable mission.”

Lawyers representing Altman immediately did not respond to a request for comment from Gizmodo.

This is not the first time that the judge seems not affected by the case. I mentioned the work from the inside In February, Judge Gonzalez Rogers expressed doubts about Musk’s claim “unorganized damage”, saying: “I have billionaires against billionaires.”

The choice of jury in the case is scheduled to start on March 30.

Musk helped start Openai with Altman and others in 2015, but he left in 2018 after differences about the place where the company went. Since then, his artificial intelligence company has launched its Xai, to go directly with Openai. The competition between them has become more intense, so that it extends to the world of politics.

Earlier this year, Musk stepped down for his role in the Ministry of Government efficiency (DOGE) and reached a public return with President Donald Trump on social media.

Almost at the same time, Germans joined Trump One meeting on one on one. Soon after, Trump publicly praised Altman Ai’s infrastructure, which was not a shy musk of criticism.