Josh Brolin is right to the reason for absorbing the broadcast

by Dru diet
| Published One hour ago

Josh Brolin was a press tour arms ((EvaluationOne quote makes tours regarding the flow. “For the moment, with a lot of content, you are just seeing things on any flow service you do, and you are only walking,” the curse, why is this very boring, man? Why? “Just go to the next thing.

It is not the most coherent and well studied argument, however Josh Brolin Does it give a strong entry point in a discussion about the reason for lower broadcasting in programming to an inevitable homogeneity? For an introduction, it is clear that there are wonderful films and series that are produced exclusively to Running Encourage the platforms, but the flow of uniqueness and the model of this work … Let’s call them the projects friendly to the algorithm that ends up to forget.

Therefore, it is worth arguing for a movie like arms It is also meanings of flowing landscapes.

Films are still important creative platforms

Josh Brolin’s comment on broadcasting is a bigger issue with what the broadcasting of the films did as an artistic form. The flowing landscape has reduced the value of a film position in the importance of pop culture. With any number of services that provide endless catalogs, special films are no longer part of their attractiveness.

Except in the cinema theater. Giving immunity to the exhibition to a new theaters’ film remains a reason for the public interest and excitement. arms Certainly prove this with Perform the box office. If you find and encourage a special film director, deal with the production of a movie like something special with a large budget, and sell it to people as a special experience, you usually end up with distinctive films than the collected films. This proves that films are still a main and marketable creative platform when it allows actual creative people to direct the ship.

The flow is the surface and hurts the directors as stars

Another important aspect of the specified medium by Josh Brolin about the broadcast is that it does not raise a new generation of unique cinematic sounds. Yes, Guilller Del Toro has strengthened a strong reputation in NetflixBut he was established before he slept with the broadcast giant. You do not see a large group of young managers who are given the spotlight as it is behind the scenes.

This is because the broadcast platforms did not encourage a strong enough environmental system (Iqra: The dollar of marketing did not spend) so that the public feels wandering towards the creators behind the camera. Streaming wants actors of well -known stars and beautiful young matches because they are like brand envoys through their nature in appearing. Designs behind these projects are not strengthened Next generation It is the manufacture of super -talent films like generations before.

There is a bigger conversation there regarding the changing control of the supervision of companies instead of old film studios and their administrative practices, not to mention the deviation of the escalating culture of artists and artistic professions across every mediator. However, I can’t say much before I face a problem. Therefore, let’s summarize this section by saying that the flow does not focus heavily on giving culture in the upcoming Stephen Spielberg.

The masses want great surprises and the flow of dumping in risk

It is clear that Josh Brollin also talks about how broadcasting is not a place to tell radical stories and film making. Made the writer/director Zach Craigger arms As a vision of the artist, it is not something that has been taken and smuggled by the data monkeys that each service uses in order to reduce any risky projects.

Broadcasting often does not take this type of movie huge fluctuations because it is not costly effective for them to do so. It is a more “rational” way to make more Strange things (Aqar itself is steeped in the non -supporting support) or the restart chain from I know what I did last summer But “the conversation”. It spreads a mentality of familiarity and comfort because this is what the banners want: loyal subscribers who look at their content libraries as comfortable and safe retreats in the actual art exhibition.

Again, it is clear that there are great movies and shows for the first time on broadcasting platforms. But Josh Brolin is right in the broadcast model itself. It is not surprising that the masses or insight permits are, and they are films like arms This proves that the cinematic theater model is still important as part of the art of cinema.

---