James Gan is not strange to the controversy. For the early part of his career, he actively operated it, as he wrote on the Premiere Bad Taste Taste Severlation Studio Troma Entertainment and made his name away from the “Romeo & Juliet”, entitled “entitled” “Tromeo & Juliet,” That brought enough sex and violence to make Shakespeare blush. Then there was Poor shooting (and subsequent restoration) From “Guardians of the Galaxy: VOL3” after drilling the extreme right -wing hunting through the history of Gunn’s NSFW Twitter for jokes in the same tablet vein.
For any of Gunn’s work before Marvel, you will be surprised to hear that his recent controversy is not limited to comparison, but hardly reaches the title of “controversy” in the first place. Because this is not a controversy about Superman’s lust for Louis Lin, where TRoma’s production may be explored with joy, but rather a simple shot from a 30 seconds commercial television This shows a superman flipping air before flying directly to the camera. Some commentators online indicated that the shot is embarrassed, and they wondered whether this is just an increasing part of CGI or a group of destruction for a movie A lot of riding on its wide shoulders.
Gin blames himself for not looking “closely” in this announcement
Nothing about making an easy movie, in an interview with Weekly entertainment, Gon talks about the type of trial and the necessary error when bringing a super hero to life in a new way. It compares the process with what he learned to make “parents from the galaxy” and how he learned a lot about how to shoot Superman fly by going out and photographing it already.
The story demands EW to ask about the commercial shot in particular, and asked her whether the fact that she became a controversial snapshot “tells” that he should put at work “to know how to withdraw these mechanics of making David fly original?” Gunn reduces the importance of the speech about this shot, saying:
“No, I don’t think it was a lot. It was a television advertisement and there was no final visual effect. So part of it flies, it was a picture of his face flies. It was a picture of a drone flying in front of an actual background. So, all the pieces were sometimes. From the shots, but sometimes, I forget to look at this closely.
Using an incomplete VFX snapshot in a 30 -second commercial advertisement will not usually cause such a noise, and perhaps now after we have confirmed that the shot will not be in the final image, we can put this supposed “controversy” to the bed. But there is something that tells me that the online dubbed Lefts will search for some of the supposed crepeonte that should descend “Superman”.
Gon, for his part, encouraged collaborators and admirers Do not take attention from the haters who “make their feathers through our hatred”, “ And that reading “Every Reddit” everything “is terrible to do it for your soul. So it is good to hear that this snapshot was not removed due to the reverse reaction, but because Gunn pays close attention to making sure that each frame of “Superman” rises to the highest possible level.
Look for yourself when “Superman” hits theaters on July 11, 2025.
Source link
https://www.slashfilm.com/img/gallery/james-gunn-removed-a-controversial-superman-trailer-shot-from-the-movie/l-intro-1750358650.jpg