It was also claimed that the Australian murderer had served the toxic pasta of the husband – my country

Australian woman Irene Patterson, Who was Kill Three of her husband’s relatives intentionally separated Toxic mushroom service for lunchHe was claimed that he tried to kill her husband using poisoned pasta, chicken curry and wrapped a sandwich.

New evidence was issued on Friday after a gag order was raised on before trial evidence. The evidence included the suspicions of Patterson’s scattered husband, Simon Patterson, that she had previously tried to kill him.

Simon Patterson, who has been suspended from his wife since 2015, witnessed in a before the trial hearing that he refused to call for a deadly lunch for fear.

He said to the court months before the trial: “I thought there would be a danger of calling me if I came.”

He also said that he stopped eating his wife, but he did not think that others would be in danger.

Judge Christopher Bell previously spent the charges of two separate experiences before the prosecutors fell charges of murder related to Simon Patterson before the trial began in April.

This means the details of the alleged attempts in her husband’s life in 2021 and 2022 were not heard by the jury.

After Irene Patterson It was convicted last monthBell ordered the suppression of the article before the trial to protect the rights of Patterson.

But on Friday, the judge ordered the restrictions that filed and rejected an argument by the Defense team, Patterson, who said that the release of the materials associated with the attention of the media could offer any possible attractiveness in the case.

“Open justice is an essential concern for our criminal justice,” Bell said.

In the newly released evidence, Simon Patterson revealed that he began to keep a table of his diseases that occurred after eating his separate wife cooking, including Poloniz Beni, Carrie Chicken and Wolf Shatira.

“After the first time I fell ill, I had the idea that I fell ill from Irene’s food.”

He claimed that the poisoning occurred during family camping trips, and he claimed that the accidents left him close to death.

In one case, Simon Patterson said he felt the disease after eating chicken Carre.

He said: “At first I felt heat, especially in my head, and this led to nauseous, then this led to a need to vomit suddenly.”

He said he became so sick that he had temporarily suffered paralysis and had removed part of the intestine. According to what was reported, doctors could not define the cause of his diseases categorically.

He said that he had raised his doubts that his scattered wife had to allow him with his doctor and his family, including his father, who died after Irene’s lunch.

Evidence has been excluded from a computer seized from the Erin Patterson house, which shows searches for other types of toxins from the experiment.

Going now

• Canada to enhance military wages up to 20 % in increasing “important” spending

• Canada Air hosts voted for strike. What comes after that?

Last month, a jury found that Patterson attracted her mother -in -law Gill Patterson, her husband, Don Patterson, and Gail’s sister, Heather Wilkenson, for lunch at her home and poisoning them with meals of beef and Landton, which contains the mushroom of death.

They also found a 50 -year -old woman guilty of killing Ian Wilkenson, Heather’s husband, who survived the 2023 meal in Irene Patterson’s house.

Patterson was initially accused of three murder charges and five charges of attempted murder in 2023, with the additional four charges related to her separate husband.

The guilty rulings, which were required to be unanimously, indicated that the jury refused to defense of Patterson that the presence of poisonous mushrooms in the meal was a terrible accident, due to the inclusion of the sinner in the twentieth mushrooms that did not know that it was death caps.

Prosecutors did not provide a motivation for the killings, but during the trial, the tense relations between Patterson and her scattered husband and frustration that she felt towards his parents in the past highlighted.

The case focused on whether Patterson was planning to kill the killing or accidentally killed three people, including the grandparents of her only children who are alive.

Her lawyers claimed that she had no reason to commit murders because she recently moved to a new house, and she was financially comfortable and has a single nursery for her children. They also said that she was scheduled to start studying for a nursing and dumping certificate.

Bell said on Friday that it is unlikely to succeed in Patterson, but it cannot be excluded.

She acknowledged that she was not guilty of the attempt to kill against her husband, and the court will hear the case on August 25 during a two -day hearing.

– With files from Reuters

& Copy 2025 Global News, a Division of Corus Entertainment Inc.