It shows the conclusion of the third season, which is the indomitable cause of MCU’s failure

This article contains Spoilers For “invincible”.

Three seasons in, it is safe to say that “Invincible” is one of the best shows on TV or broadcast. It is a visual amazing, supported by the talents of the star’s sound crew, and has some of the strongest writing of any series of types that are currently broadcast. The offer is good as it was at the end of the third season, and some of the most expensive adjustments to the comic book on the block can study “invincible”. The Marvel Universe, in particular, can learn something or two of the third season conclusion alone.

After a season, it consists of mostly from cross stories, and the building of characters for Oliver (Christian Conferry), Eve (Gillian Jacobs), Cecil (Walton Gugs), and Mark (Stephen Yun) grows to his own responsibility, the last two episodes are a difficult shock to the regime. Comedy fans were ready for the “unnecessary war” arc, where Angstrom Leve (Steling K. Brown) It attacks the Earth with a team of evil from all over the universe. But if you did not know that they were coming, the destruction of the fibrous attack and the subsequent appearance of the invasion of the warrior (Jeffrey Dean Morgan) had brought the wind out of you.

It is a brutal conclusion, both due to the unprecedented destruction and death that is seen on the ground and because of the emotional impact on the characters. However, despite its impressive scene, “Invincible” always provides the characteristics of the movement. Often late, the MCU has been doing things in the other direction, and this is part of the difficulty of Disney’s franchise over the past few years.

Although “Invincible” is full of funny characters, bright fashion and fictional/fictional ideas, they succeed because they always remain based on the emotional life of her characters. Omni-Man (JK Simmons) is convincing because of the conflict inside it, which drives a lot of the dominant story. The same applies to Mark’s growth and development as a hero, brother and friend-especially in the third season. It is appropriate that in a season in which Mark is constantly facing his relationship with violence, he ends up fighting violent versions of himself. The invincible war is an objective peak as it is the peak of action, which is why it is severely hit.

The same applies to the conquest – a very evil that indicates the greatest threat in the filterite that it has no real name. Al -Fateh represents everything Mark is afraid: a strong destructive power that there is nothing that he can do to save the people he loves. In the end, the lesson is that he does not do Ownership To do everything himself. Eve surrounds herself and ultimately provides a blow that weakens the conquest to the point of defeat.

Now think The last several years of Marvel Studios stories. Anthony Maki is a great actor, but “Captain America: Brave New World” falls because it gives him a very little material. The concession flourished during the story of Infiniti because characters like Tony Stark (Robert Downey Junior) have consistent and long -term arches around which the biggest conflicts revolve. Tony’s vision went from the selfish Playboy game to his final sacrifice is the heart of the early MCU stages. It is the same reason that made “Guardians of the Galaxy” movies very successful, and why people love “Loki”. But what characters lead anything in the biggest MCU now?

It is not only about individual arches. There are characters in a relationship with each other – something that “invincible” understands well. Season 3 contains multiple romantic arches, stinging, and other complex relationships. during Rix memorial service (Jason Mantzocas) At the end of the third season “invincible”, the multiple supportive characters stand to speak, and they all have distinctive feelings about his death because we saw their unique relationships with him.

By comparison, one of the falls of the Marvel’s Scattershot Star model is that it keeps the characters away from each other. This was especially true in the Disney+era. It is very expensive and difficult from the perspective of scheduling for multiple basic characters on the screen for more than one year scenes. The older “Avengers” films worked because it presented this context to build relationships, but we hadn’t had a movie since “The End of the game.”

It is clear that “Invincible” has the benefit of being one TV program, not a huge privilege. It is more compact, cleaner and animation fee makes it easier to keep a large list of talents on the tap. However, I can only feel that this one series has more personalities that care more than MCU at this stage. The third “invincible” season does a great job in giving useful and convincing materials to most supportive actors, from RAE (GRIFIFIN) contraction to Titan (Tod Williams). You do not need three movies and two flowing veils to make viewers care about someone, you only need deliberate writing – which MCU lacks in recent years.

It is impressive, “invincible”, which remains active at any time. Certainly, they may not all exist in each episode, but it is a major group in the budget of settings and bonuses. Each story appears to be like a special time, and those sections are perfectly lining up so that one completely explodes, three other pivotal moments of their own. You only need to look at the final montage of the 3 “invincible” season, which restores many sleeping threads while showing different characters to complete seasonal arches.

In the early MCU, even in the film concession model that was not allowed to tell the stories of television, Marvel Studios did a good job in doing the same. The overlap of various sub -exams, the largest bad guys such as Hydra and Thanos, and the dynamic construction of the Avengers team coinciding with each other. This high art was not exactly, but it was enough that when “Infinity War” and “Endgame” came out, directors Anthony and Joe Rousseau came out a deep bag of emotional currency to benefit from fans.

The current Marvel Studios model seems to be more interested in preserving various separate characters and series, which is necessarily bad. However, the Ideas Council has struggled to balance this section with the huge budgets and the goals of “showing events” in the past. If you don’t want everyone to have to see everything, you cannot expect the “Avengers” audience. With DC studios on the verge of starting its new age, Marvel may have a shrink window to find out things.

“Invincible” flows on the main video.