Iran FM Aragici warns Europe against the “reckless” approach in the nuclear deal Nuclear Energy News

“Iran is open to” a realistic and permanent deal. “

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Aragchi, Britain, France and Germany, accused of following up a “reckless” strategy in his country’s nuclear program, warning that their compatibility with Washington will not reduce Europe’s global position only.

Writing in Guardian On Sunday, Aragchi said the decision of the so -called E3 to raise a process could restore United Nations sanctions “lack any legal status” and must fail.

Recommended stories

List of 3 elementsThe end of the list

“The truth is that they are following the interest of the reckless work course … This is a great miscalculation that is necessary to reverse results,” Aragchchi wrote.

In August, Germany, France and the United Kingdom-the largest European economy-have sparked 30-day operation to stimulate “Snapback” sanctions on what they called “major violations” of the 2015 agreement to reduce the Iranian nuclear program.

The United States, which bombed three nuclear facilities in June as part of Israeli attack In Iran, she welcomed the movement of European countries.

Aragchchi accused the three forces of ignoring the fact that the United States, not Iran, was the one that withdrew from the 2015 joint action plan (JCPOA). While Tehran took what he described as “legal treatment measures” under the agreement, E3 failed to adhere to their own obligations.

Aragici indicated that European leaders pledged to protect trade with Iran after US President Donald Trump re -sanctions in 2018.

Instead, he argued that Europe has acted as a passer -by, and it is famous for Washington’s aggressive approach. “Participation” wrote in this deal, “publicly encouraged illegal military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities protected by international law – as the German advisor did – does not constitute” participation “in the deal.

German advisor Friedrich Mirz In June, he suggested that the West benefits from the Israeli attack against Iran.

“This is a dirty act that Israel does for all of us,” He said.

Aragchi stressed in the trustee column that Tehran is still open to dialogue. “(Iran) is ready to photograph a realistic and permanent deal that requires the supervision of iron and restrictions on enrichment in exchange for ending the sanctions,” he said.

He warned that ignoring this opportunity could drown the area in deeper instability, especially amid escalating tensions with Israel. “The powerful armed forces in Iran are ready and once again capable of Israel to run for” the father “to save it,” Aragcha, on the pretext that the Israeli provocations that risk the United States to costly conflicts.

The Trump administration also claimed that the door is still open to talks with Iran.

“The United States is still available for direct participation with Iran – in strengthening a peaceful and permanent decision for the Iranian nuclear issue,” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement after E3 announced the sanctions last month.

“Snapback does not contradict our serious willingness to diplomacy, but only enhances it.”

It was a round of nuclear talks between us and Iranian officials It is scheduled to happen On June 15. But Israeli bombs began to fall on Tehran two days before the scheduled negotiations, and postpone them indefinitely.

Washington insists that Iran cannot enrich uranium locally, but Iran insists that its right to enrichment is not negotiable.

The 2015 nuclear deal – which rises during its first term as an American president – is granted the right to enrich uranium at a low level of civil purposes under a strict monitoring system.

The Snapback mechanism at JCPOA gave any party to the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia or China-the start of the process of reviving six decisions of the United Nations Security Council sanctions.

And Snapback is resistant to veto transportation, The meaning of Russia China, both of which are Iran’s allies, cannot prevent the restoration of sanctions.

In 2020, the United States tried to revitalize the Snapback item in JCPOA, but the effort failed because Washington is no longer involved in the agreement.