President Donald Trump’s attempt to dismiss the ruler of the Federal Reserve, Lisa Cook A. Legal confrontation On the independence of the central bank. But at at least in Wall Street, some investors are not concerned about institutional standards; Instead, they are excited about the possibility of getting cheaper money over time.
“This is very positive,” said Jay Philseld, CEO of Infrastructure Capital Advisors. luck. “The simple way to say is that eliminating the inefficiency in the federal reserve is much more important than defending the alleged Federal Reserve Independence. The federal reserve has always been political; it’s only Trump is what he talked about in public places.”
In fact, the markets have greatly ignored the advertisement, to the confusion of some economic expert Argue The markets are “insoluble.”
“The firm expectations of institutional integrity are now a gab.”
S & P 500 and Dao It was circulated around the flat line on Tuesday morning, while Nasdak Even gain 0.3 %. Treasury revenue increased in the long run after Trump moved, while short -term revenues decreased, which led to the spread of the curve, indicating that investors are that betting rates may decrease in the short term, but the erosion is higher if the political federal reserve proves less interested in inflation. The US dollar index fell 0.3 %.
For the phone, this is the point. He said that the federal reserve is very narrow, as policy rates sit “150 basis points higher than neutrality”, which means that monetary policy restricts growth too too.
He said: “If the Federal Reserve’s funds are 3 % and the president is paying for great discounts, it will be dangerous.” “But we are not near that.”
Trump is already Nominated Stephen Miran to the Federal Reserve after one of the conservatives decided to step down earlier this month, so the replacement of Cook will give him a fourth voice alongside the appointed earlier Michelle Bowman, Christopher and Er. This would tend to the Board of Governors from seven members towards a majority of Republicans.
The possibility of the Federal Reserve, which tends to the Republican, is one of the reasons why the phone believes that the discounts are coming.
“A tariff is like one-time tax-it appears in the consumer price index once and then disappears,” he said.
Philseld added that both Waller and Bowman, both of whom opposed their decision last month to keep fixed rates, understand that the customs tariff is not a fixed driver for inflation. On the other hand, he is offended by the rulers appointed by Democrats, which caused “delaying discounts and endangering the economy.”
“So getting rid of the Federal Reserve Powell is very positive for the stock market and the bond market,” he said.
In the short term, Vebleld expects at least cuts this year, echoing the Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell recent signals.
He said: “Overnight, I saw a knee sale in bonds, but if we would get discounts, this is great for bonds and wonderful to shares.”
Independence at risk, with fragile handrails only from the market
Other economic experts are less optimistic. David Wesel from Brookings to caution “It seems that Trump is determined to control the Federal Reserve – and will use any lever to obtain the majority,” describing it as another step in undermining democratic institutions.
Analysts at the Investment Bank Piper Sandler They were equally directly, the investors who deceive themselves argue if they believed that the markets would lead to Trump’s discipline.
“What is the basis for the belief that the so -called Bond Sayyun Siopkh Congress before the crisis is within reach?” They wrote, referring to the markets that did not expect inflation shock for 2022 or a bust of housing before the global financial crisis. Instead, they argued that stocks simply gather on the possibility of price discounts, “even if they may come partially due to political pressure.”
The greatest risks that analysts refer to are structural. As analyst Jim Bianco explained xThe Federal Reserve Governors must re-evaluate-or the veto-all of them from all heads of the Federal Regional Reserves when their five-year periods are expired in February 2026.
With more appointed Trump in the Board of Directors, even leaders such as Austan Fuolsby in Chicago or John Williams in New York can find their jobs in danger, with FOMC balance.
Piper Sandler warned that “the long roll market columns are removed one by one,” unlike a more free trade and “the column of voice money in the process of exposure mainly.” They concluded that the market is unlikely to serve as an inspection of Federal Reserve politicization.
Currently, the markets focus on mitigating the short term.
The UBS expert at UBS Ulrik Hoffman-Portradi told customers that its team is still expected to offer the Federal Reserve 100 points of discounts during the next four meetings.
She wrote in a note: “We will continue to monitor the increasing political pressure on the Federal Reserve, but we expect the decision -making process to be guided by its mandate in the short term.”
Philseld, for his part, is not interested in what he calls “alleged independence”.
“Inflation is already present, the labor market is weakening, and we are heading to recession,” he said. “The real story is not Trump against the Federal Reserve – it is that the federal reserve was incompetent for decades, and the markets know this. Any step towards positive reform.”
https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/GettyImages-2221374277-e1756228056468.jpg?resize=1200,600
Source link