Inside the 30 -year -old billion

Lucy Guo may be a billionaire, but instead of a life of luxury and comfort, it was sworn by the ethics of work that is unavoidable and a strict daily routine.

At only 30 years old, a California businessman and a reference will have been fulfilled by many to chase their lives. In April, the net value of Guo rose to $ 1.3 billion after its first work, Scale Ai, concluded a deal With a technology giant Dead The company is estimated at $ 25 billion. It is called The smallest pumice woman billionaireIt is a title previously by pop star Taylor Swift.

“Frankly, I still feel such a little girl, like my life before money and after the money, this has not changed much,” said CNBC in an interview.

GUO participated in the founding of AI, a company to classify artificial intelligence data, along with Alexander Wang In 2016, GUO, who headed the operating and product design teams at Silicon Valley Startup, left the company in 2018.

“We had differences about products and sales,” I explained. “Alex was very driven by sales on bringing more customers, I was highly focused on” hey, we need to give priority to products or help to ensure that the scale (employees) get their salaries on time, their hours are calculated correctly, but this was not the place where the resources are poured. “

However, Guo holds a share, which is less than 5 %. When Meta agreed to get 49 % of Scale AI, the GUO’s share paid a rise of $ 1.25 billion.

The Qara forces, a serial entrepreneur and graduated from the THEEL program, were not out of the game for a long time and found Backend Capital, the capital of investment capital in startups in the early stage in 2019. $ 65 million in financing.

Since she became billionaire, Gao did not remove her foot from the work pedal. “I am still doing very long working days,” she said.

The young founder embodies the Silicon Valley talisman to work 24 hours a day, seven days a week, similar Culture culture in China 996Which includes work from 9 am to 9 pm six days a week.

“From 9 am to 9 pm, this balance between work and life remains,” “at 9 pm, you can go for dinner with your friends. You can invite them to Potluck. You don’t need to sleep from nine to nine. This is a sarcastic amount of sleep.”

“If anyone thinks that this is not a balance between work and life, I do not know what to say because you are literally from 9 pm to 2 in the morning to hang with your friends, then sleep from 2 to nine. This is seven hours of sleep, and it is more than enough.”

But not everyone agrees with the pursuit of a 996 -aged schedule. Some founders have already pushed back against the direction, and they told CNBC that outdated views and unnecessary to achieve success.

“

Surnga Chandratillake, the general partner at Balderton Capital, added that 996 revolves around “excessive work makers instead of smart work … it is a legend.”

The constituents of startups are a major problem. Recently, some of the owners of investment capital have pushed European founders to Extravagance of the pace of work To keep pace with their counterparts in the United States and China.

“In general, when your company begins for the first time, it is impossible to do this without doing this (996), just as you will need to work like 90 hours of work to get things out.”

As the company grows, it uses more talents, and you find stability, Qah says it is possible to work at a later time.

She noted that becoming a billionaire not related to extensive work hours. If you are constantly investing hundreds of thousands in S & P 500It can grow to billions by the end of your life, according to Q and.

“I don’t think you need to work in those hours to become billionaire, in itself. It is the way you choose to do so. If you choose to start a technical company, you will work in those hours at the beginning. If you love, the main method does this by investing, you will not work in those hours.”

The latest GUO start, was involved, involved in controversy in February after a Collective lawsuit It was presented against it and the company, claiming that it had distributed sexual assault materials to children to the platform to pay the subscribers.

“I think it is completely disrupted. I never met this person, and I never spoke with this person,” said Quh on the lawsuit.

A Passes spokesman told CNBC that makes him via e -mail.

Clark Smith Felzur, the lying company in New York, which filed the lawsuit against passes, has not yet responded to the CNBC request for comment.