Foreign capital has long been the backbone of national development – which feeds infrastructure, advanced technology, and delivery of investment gaps that local savings cannot fill alone. From railways to renewable energy, it confirms the aspirations that reshape economics. However, in India, the financial lifeline often finds itself itself in a series of cultural fire.
By highlighting this paradox, Sherfastava, founder and director of Wiskom Hatch, indicated that while countries around the world welcome foreign capital to build national wealth, the Indians are uniquely.
In a post on X (previously Twitter), Shrivastava wrote, “Every nation on Earth has become rich by bringing foreign wealth.
- UK when they looted India
- Spain and Portugal when they were ship merchants
- United States: When you export US dollars to the world
- Even China: It is a pure source and brings foreign wealth.
Only Indians, who are considered foreign capital, are unclean. We need group education. “
His publication sparked a wave of responses, as users resonated concerns about India’s reluctance to embrace global capital.
One of the users pointed out, “Every rich country was pulled to foreign capital first, then he later preached self -relying.
Another added, “I am not sure that it is about purity, it seems that it looks like a mixture of trauma after colonialism + self -reliance in its place.” Swadshi “has been glorified so difficult that” foreign capital “has become synonymous for sale. We do not need a collective education, we need the mentality of redistribution.”
A third vote warned of practical risks: “People are transferred with SIP flow plans on YouTube. Just because Diis has a majority share of Fiis does not mean that we can start from” Fiis “. This is illusion.
https://akm-img-a-in.tosshub.com/businesstoday/images/story/202505/682f15398f5db-his-post-sparked-a-flurry-of-responses–with-users-echoing-concerns-over-indias-reluctance-to-embra-221444114-16×9.jpg
Source link