“India is not yet present”: Anupam Mittal Tears in the blind skill batch of Ai Tech Elite

Shark Tank India and founder of the founder of Shaadi.com Anupam Mittal sparked a sharp debate about the first narration of technology in India, after sharing a picture of an elderly woman working as a delivery person, and urged the country to review her blind pushing towards Amnesty International and deep technology without recognizing the ground reality.

“I saw this woman on the last day, and I thought she might have to learn Beton,” Metal wrote on LinkedIn, along with the picture. “Maybe it can also adjust LLM, while connecting your groceries.”

His position was not just a mockery-it was a punk criticism of seeing the technology tunnel in India.

He said: “Every time I say that India needs jobs with deep technology, someone sends me a white paper in the skill of artificial intelligence. Basically, the West’s prostitution without understanding our reality.”

Metal acknowledged that artificial intelligence and automation transform the global workforce-technology giants such as Microsoft, Meta and Google have expected that 40-50 % of work will be driven in the next few years. “Yes, correct!” books. “But these are low -population economies, high official workers, and deep recycling budgets.”

He mentioned his time in the United States, Metal indicated the size of the institutional rise abroad. “When I worked in the United States, every time a new technology or program is published, we were stumbling in actual time – not like individuals, but through everything. This is what the infrastructure of real skill seems to be.”

In contrast, India is far from being ready. “Most of them work for their own account. India is not yet.” In this context, he said that the concert economy was the decisive life artery. “I have enabled millions of workers. In a country that owns about 20 % of the world’s population, this is not a feat!”

Metal warned of deep romance technology as a silver bullet. “When we start to back down from deep technology as the only solution to all our problems, we are at risk to live a billion plus nation.”

Acknowledging India’s dual identity: “Yes, we have very skilled and very talented people, Sibnion, undoubtedly, a large technology in the future from India-but we also have a large population with low skills that must be taken.”

“India needs to treat these two cases at the same time, no?” He asked in conclusion. “What is your opinion?”