India confesses a jet losses in a clash with Pakistan: Here is what he said India Pakistan news tensions

General Anil Zhuhan, Chief of Defense Staff in India, admitted that an unspecified number of Fighter planes were dropped During her struggle with Pakistan last month.

Air losses by the country’s highest level in the country come weeks after South Asia’s neighbor’s joints involved their heaviest fighting for decades, which included combat aircraft and cruise missiles.

Indian officials had previously rejected or rejected Pakistani claims to stop Indian aircraft. The conflict was operated after armed men killed 26 tourists in the town of Paalgam run by India on April 22.

The first official acceptance of India to lose combat aircraft came during the Chouhan interviews on the sidelines of the Shangri Dialogue Forum, not in Singapore.

What was the conflict between India and Pakistan?

India carried out strikes about what he called “terrorist infrastructure” in Pakistan and Kashmir, which is run by Pakistan on May 7 in the Bahama attack. India blamed the Pakistan -backed armed groups in the April 22 attack.

It is called an armed group Resistance Front (TRF) He claimed responsibility for Paalgam. India has accused TRF of being a branch of the Pakistan Armed Armed Group for Lashkar-E-TAIBA (let). Pakistan denied its involvement, condemned the Bahajam attack and called for a neutral investigation.

India has claimed that it had targeted at least six cities in Pakistan and Kashmir run by Pakistan on the first day of the conflict. Pakistan initially confirmed that it had shot down six Indian fighter planes in revenge. But senior Pakistan officials He said Al Jazeera Five Indian planes were lost in the air battle.

India has not confirmed or denied Pakistani claims. “The losses are part of the fighting.”

The Indian embassy in China has called on reports of “misinformation” aircraft.

After that, the cross -border attacks via the LOC line, the real border between the Kashmir of India and Pakistan, shook the region, and renewed fears of the nuclear war.

On May 10, US President Donald Trump announced that the two countries had connected to a ceasefire, and may avoid a “nuclear disaster”. India and Pakistan made competing claims about the losses in the fighting, but more than 70 people were killed on both sides.

India and Pakistan Kashmir are completely claimed, but it only runs parts of Himalayas with an Islamic majority.

Here is what Chauhan said in recent interviews with Reuters and Bloomberg TV:

On the entry of Indian combat aircraft

Chahhan admitted that India was lost in the air on the first day of the fighting without providing details.

In an interview with Reuters, he said: “The important thing is why these losses occurred and what we will do after that.”

The Indian general said that after the losses, the Indian army “corrected tactics”, then returned on May 7, 8 and 10 “in large numbers to hit the air in the depths of Pakistan, and penetrated all their air defenses without punishment and accurate strikes. He added that the Indian Air Force “flew all kinds of aircraft with all types of ammunition” on May 10.

Islamabad admitted that her air rules suffer from some losses, but she denied that she had lost any planes.

When the Bloomberg correspondent asked Qohan about Pakistan’s allegations that six Indian aircraft were shot down, Chahanhan replied that this information was incorrect.

He went on to say: “The important thing is … not the planes that were dropped, but why were they dropped.” Some media concluded that his statement seemed to mean that a number of aircraft were lost in the air battle.

The general did not provide details about the number of planes that were dropped or details about what these corrected tactics are.

The Pakistani army said that India did not fly its fighter planes in the conflict again after it was exposed to air losses.

On the dangers of nuclear war

Media reports indicated that some attacks were near nuclear sites in Pakistan, but the nuclear infrastructure itself was not a target.

“Most of the strikes have been delivered with specific accuracy, some even to a meter (3.3 feet) to all the chosen effect point,” Qohan said in the interview with Reuters.

Qohan had previously made assurances that India did not consider the use of nuclear weapons during the conflict. Pakistan Chief of Staff of Pakistan, General Saher Shamshad Mirza, did the same for his country.

“I think there is a lot of space before crossing that nuclear threshold, and a lot of reference before that. I don’t think something like this happened. There is a large space for the traditional processes that were created, and this will be the new rule,” said Qohan.

The Indian general added that on both sides, most rational people wear military uniforms “during the conflict because they understand the consequences of” this kind of conflict. “

“I found both sides offered a lot of rationality in their ideas as well as procedures. Why do we assume that in the nuclear field there will be irrationality on the one hand?”

On the Chinese role

The Chief of Staff of the Indian Defense said that although Pakistan had a close alliance with China, there was no sign that Beijing helped Islamabad during the conflict.

China is located on the northern and eastern borders in India and controls the northeastern region barely called Aksai Chin.

“We did not find any unusual activity in the operational or tactical depth of our northern borders, and things were overall in general.”

When Qohan was asked if China had provided Pakistan with intelligence information such as satellite images, the Indian general replied by saying that this information is commercially available and that Pakistan could have obtained it from China or other sources.

However, Zhhan said, “Nearly 80 percent of the equipment has been bought in Pakistan from China in the past few years.

From 2020 to 2025, China presented 81 percent One of the weapons imports in Pakistan, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

Chinese aircraft obtained a batch after media reports that Pakistan used Chinese J-10C combat aircraft in the air battle. The Chinese government did not formally confirm that the J-10C Jets was used to land the Indian aircraft, but the Chinese central television, the state broadcaster, was published on social media on May 17 that the aircraft achieved actual combat results for the first time.

What next

Zhuan said that although hostilities stopped, India “will respond carefully and decisively if there are any other terrorist attacks emitting from Pakistan.” He added that this will be a new natural for India.

“Therefore, its own dynamics (as) are related to the armed forces. We will require us to be ready around the clock throughout the week.”

The head of the Indian National Congress Party, the main opposition, said that the acceptance of Qohan calls for a review of defensive preparedness in India.

“There are some important questions that must be asked. It can only be asked if a special session of Parliament is conducted immediately.”

In reference to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, he added: “The Moody government has misled the nation. The fog of war is now.”

“We salute the” Indian Army “courage and courage,” said outside. “However, the comprehensive strategic review is the need for the watch.”

The Congress Party launched the PAAALGAM attack on “the failure of security and intelligence” and asked to be accountable, given that India -run Kashmir rules directly from New Delhi.