India against China: viral discussion by Ca Sparks about lost opportunities and stopping implementation

Photo of author

By [email protected]


In a sharp comment on social media, the legal accountant Nitin Kaushik ignited the debate about the economic path of India by comparing it with China’s rise in China. In a detailed post on X, he argued that contracts of suspended death, chronic delay, and short -term policy have left India behind its neighbor.

“On an equal footing once, and now miles away.”

Kaushik noted that in the 1980s, India and China were almost equal. Today, the Chinese economy is the largest of nearly five times. “India against China – uncomfortable truth, no one likes to admit,” he wrote. “How did we fall away from behind him? Can we catch a knee?”

Infrastructure gap: the story of two trains

To clarify the contrast, Kaushik referred to the transportation infrastructure. “In Shanghai, you can ride a train covering 1,200 km in four hours. In India, the bullet train in Mumbai-Abad was agreed 10 years ago and is still stuck. It is not only about trains. It is about speed-building, deciding, and implementing it.”

The numbers that are scared

He highlighted that the economic gap is blatant:

  • Chinese GDP: 17 trillion dollars (1,417 rupees)
  • GDP GDP: 3.5 trillion dollars (292 rupees)
  • Average Chinese income: $ 10.6 per year
  • Average Indian income: $ 2.02 per year

“In 1980, these numbers were almost similar. Something happened after that …” Kaushik note.

The moment of China “switch”

China has been attributed to Deng Xiaoping’s reforms. They decided: “We will become the world factory.” The Earth was cleared in weeks, and Sezs like Shenzhen, and by 2009, China has become the largest source in the world.

Why is India fighting with death?

Kaushik blames a delay in the chronic project in India for land disputes and political roads. “78 % of road projects, 75 % of the railway projects, and 22 % of energy -related energy projects. Tata Nano faced in Western Bengal because of policy. Tameson Tameson Nado failed federation issues. In China? The iPhone factory was approved in three weeks.”

Democracy dilemma

He also pointed to the challenges of governance. “Free India elections are often rewarded in the short term in the long term. 46 % of deputies face serious criminal cases. Ghanners find tax loopholes, the poor get plans, and the middle class pays both. China dictatorship guarantees brutal efficiency-there are no protests, and there are no opponents.”

Can India catch a knee?

Despite the dark comparisons, Kaushik struck an optimistic note with caution. “Yes, but it needs contracts of discipline, not election sessions for a period of five years. We must expand the axes beyond four trilogy cities, raise manufacturing from 14 % to 25 %+ from gross domestic product, and transform the edge of the English -speaking speaker into an export force, investment in skills, not only grades.”

He concluded an invitation to implement excuses: “Democracy is not an enemy. The weak execution is. China’s growth from planning + harsh implementation came. India can reach there-if we start now and think in the long run.”



https://akm-img-a-in.tosshub.com/businesstoday/images/story/202509/68bc60abbba5f-kaushik-noted-that-in-the-1980s–india-and-china-were-nearly-on-par-today–chinas-economy-is-nearl-062614379-16×9.jpg

Source link

Leave a Comment