“If you leave, Bangaluru comrades, Mumbai”: Jurujram entrepreneurship in the murderer of the city’s construction

The entrepreneur Rajish Saohani raised a storm at the end of this week with the praise of Mumbai, Bengaluru, and Georgram as “cities built by immigrants”-only to face violent reactions from the local population who defend the deep legacy of their hometown, especially Bengaluru.

In his position, Sawhney wrote, “Mumbai, Bangalore and Jorgram – these three Indian cities were built by migrants and are the most universal in nature.” Immigrants have been restricted by converting sleeping cities into axes of financing, technology and entrepreneurship.

Mumbai described it as the original business capital, which was formed by national talents attracted to multinational companies, banks and industrial houses – from Tattas to Adanis. He claimed that Bangaluru was a quiet city until the boom of information technology, and attracted talents from all over southern India. He said Gurugram has evolved from a dusty village to a hot point to start operating thanks to BPOS and migrants in entrepreneurship.

“The indigenous people have benefited greatly from these transformations and they must celebrate this contribution by migrants instead of inciting it by politicians to resent the immigrants,” said Sawhney.

This feeling did not sit well with many Bengal. One of the users answered, “Bangalore was the city of Naasan? Really? Please search you.” They referred to pre -surface institutions such as Hal, DRDO and beml, which formed the industrial identity of Bangaluru long before the technology boom.

Another user wrote, “Kempegowda built a city 500 years ago with the city’s planning. Bangaluru got electricity before most Asia. It attracted PSUS and IISC a long time before startups arrive.”

Others accused Sony of rejecting the local legacy in favor of a narration that focuses on immigrants. “A modest request for all immigrants: Go back and build your original places. Bangaluru will become a better place without you,” a user wrote, echoing increasing feelings about population overcrowding and cultural corrosion in major Indian cities.

While some agreed to the view of Sawhney on global growth, the greatest response reflects the increasing discomfort with urban congestion, infrastructure, and a perceived lack of respect for local history and culture.