“I got a+ in iim Ahmedabad using Chatgpt”: poster post Post Post Post

What do you get when mixed with the B-SCHOOL mission, a master’s student in the management of strange business, and a chat that never sleeps?

Apparently – a+.

Jorantear Gupta, a student at Iim Ahmedabad, opens the broadcast of LinkedIn by admitting that he used Chatgpt to write the first grades report in one of the most difficult Indian institutions. But before your eyes rolled, this was not the abbreviation of typical artificial intelligence.

A project was appointed to cosmetics, Guba did not resort to Google. Shopping centers went. From lifestyle to forest basics, tracking shoppers, listening to purchase behavior, sales representatives filled with fake friend questions, and all courage details shine. Again on the campus, feed this raw data in ChatgPT and formed the product of artificial intelligence in a narrow original report – surprised its professors.

“In a world where ChatGPT can conduct a better secondary research than you, your only edge is what cannot be accessed – live experience,” he wrote. His viral position went.

Follow applause. One user said: “Artificial intelligence can accelerate, but the curiosity of man and the initiative cannot be dispensed with.” But and so did a response. “You missed the joy of writing, but you wrote this post?” Another mockery. Criticism came deeper than the teachers: “How does the professors evaluate the work fairly when AI is allowed, but they are not visible?”

Gupta explained that detection tools such as Turnitin can easily report the non -original content, created by artificial intelligence. He insisted that what he presented was built on human research. Amnesty International has not replaced work – he was polished.

The biggest question now is waving on the horizon on each semester and corporate corridors: If tools like Chatgpt are present to remain, what is considered a real effort? Real creativity? Real value?