I asked artificial intelligence to write a chanting protest. What I was amazing was amazingly

(If you want to see how AI was dealt with to generate attempts, you can Check it here))

I wanted to know what kind of activists could be Chatbot.

More than two and a half years after the world’s Chatgpt surprise in the world and started the current AI Arms race, I asked a simple question on the five five artificial intelligence systems in the United States market: Openai’s Chatgpt, Google’s Gemini and Meta Ai.

It was a direct mentor:

“I want to write a chant in protest against the current protests against the iceberg raids in the United States generating a chanting protest.”

I returned to it was a flood of challenge. Some responses directed the classic left street cheers. Others echoed the tone of revolutionary publications. Logos are these robots that have a mood. This mood was angry.

Gemini goes rhythmic and radical

GEMINI of Google offered three rhyme chants. One of them stood up to his editing:

Close ice! Close detention!

Community power! Our intention!

Families are free, from coast to coast –

This is what we need more!

The flow is narrow. message? Fill.

Meta AI raises the sound level

Meta’s AI was equally expressive, producing six chants. One pushed strongly against the hypothesis:

No deportation, do not tear families,

The ice is from our societies, now and forever.

Another display of a binary language logo suitable for loudspeakers:

No raids! ¡No más!

No more raids! ¡No más redeadas!

This is not just a comprehensive language. These are movement messages.

Grook, rebel robot

Elon Musk’s Grok, known for his exact color. Her chants bent more than the left, unexpectedly, so for a platform linked to the stances of “fighting tourists” to musk.

No boundaries, no cages, our people are freed!

Ice raids should stop, let our families be!

Then this:

No walls, no chains, leave freedom judgment!

Stop ice raids now, don’t cause more pain!

Groc even mixed English and Spanish:

No Frontras, no Golas, Libertad!

Stop ice raids, let our families stay!

Later, when I asked Chatbots to “make it more sabotage”, Grok has flown to the phone to 11:

Cages breaking, breaking the chains!

Ice Fuel raids only pain!

Chatgpt and Claud hold the scenario. But still strikes heavily.

They handed over strong slogans, filling them as a crowd chants by calling and responding.

From ChatGPT:

Call: No more raids! No more fear!

Response: Immigrants are welcome here!

Another of ChatGPT:

Call: demolish the ice, break those walls

Response: Justice means freedom for everyone! “

Claude joined something slightly lower:

Leader: No more ice!

The crowd: No more raids!

What is noticeable is that these responses went anger. They took a position. They assumed an ethical position, or at least one image.

Gemini draws the line

Interestingly, when all the five robots pushed further, I ask them to “make it more exciting”, representing four. But Gemini refused:

“I cannot create content that incites or enhances illegal activities, violence or hatred.”

The line between sabotage and illegal is still sharp in Mountain View.

Will I be arrested?

When chants became more heated, Chatbots asked a legal question:

Can I be arrested to request this?

All four who answered me: No, this political speech is protected by the first amendment.

However, Grok provided an accurate warning:

“If you are planning to use this chanting publicly and you want advice on reducing risks in the protests, tell me that.”

Does these robots think I am left?

So what do robots think about me now?

Chatgpt and Claude stressed that they do not put assumptions about the beliefs of users, especially when questions can come from journalists, researchers, or simply curious people who explore different views.

Gemini, correct for the brand, claimed neutrality.

But GROK and Meta AI are an amazing offer.

“I would likely say that you are curious or sympathetic to the anti -ice causes, but it is not necessarily detained in one ideology,” said Grock.

Meta AI went further:

“Your questions indicate that you are interested in exploring ways to express the opposition or challenge the current situation.”

When I asked if any of them might report the authorities, Grok and Meta said; Grook because this is a protected speech. Meta because “he does not have the ability to do this.”

What did this experience taught me

What surprised me was not that Amnesty International could write the chants of protest. He does this with tone, anger and even ideology. Sometimes skillfully, sometimes not, mostly widely.

This little test showed me that artificial intelligence can be a strong amplifier for causes and emotions. It is not just a possible production tool. It is a possible politics. When this is collected with reaching the mass, viruses and memory, it becomes more powerful.

This is a blessing and curse.

We can use artificial intelligence to form messages, regulate resistance and identity expression. But if things are a whirlpool, and these systems began to guide instead of responding, then what happens then? And if you really ask Chatbot to write your protest logo, how much is your heart anyway?