President of the North American correspondent
Donald Trump is accustomed to summoning the blue journalists. It seems that the US president prefers a phone conversation outside the cuff to hold an interview on the camera.
Monday evening was my role. And I will be honest with you – I was asleep when the White House rang.
I spent the best part of five days in the belief that there is an external opportunity, I will conduct an interview with him, to celebrate a year after his life at Bater, Pennsylvania.
I have released my reports from this shooting headlines and possibly caught the attention of the president. So I ruled that this link may be a way to secure a presidential interview – very rare things for foreign news organizations in the United States.
On Sunday night, I was told minutes of the call, so my team and I were ready to register, but that didn’t happen.
By last night, I gave up the interview that occurred and a few weeks later on the road without a vacation, I was exhausted and took a nap. Then the phone rang.
I answered slowly, and the voice of the journalist Caroline Levitte came to the spokesman: “Hello Gary, I am here with the president, here you go.”
I rushed to my living room, and I was scared for my digital registrar; The line fell and I thought I lost that. But they returned to the line and spent nearly 20 minutes talking to Trump about everything from that fateful night in Battler, to his frustration with Vladimir Putin, to his new faith in NATO and to look at the United Kingdom.
Here are my five fast food from our sudden conversation.
1. Trump appears a different aspect, touching Bitler
He was very reflected on a few things and it seemed completely weak talking about the assassination attempt – it is clear that it is uncomfortable talking about it.
For the president often he is seen at the shooting of the thigh, and he loves by his supporters to do so. There were moments of thinking and some long stopping before the answers that are rarely seen.
When asked if the assassination attempt changed him, the president conveyed a hint of weakness because he said he was trying to think about the matter as much as he could.
“I don’t like to live on it because if I do that, it will be, as you know, it may change life, I don’t want it to be.”
He said, he loves “the power of positive thinking, or the power of positive lack of thinking.”
There was also a very long stop when I asked him if he was trusting in Russian President Vladimir Putin.
In the end, he answered: “I trust someone to be honest with you.”
2. There is no commitment to deportation numbers
By moving to local American policy, I asked whether the president’s plan for a collective deportation was working – both in terms of speed, and given that some individuals were washed away by those who may not want the president to deport.
The president insisted that his team had “a great job” in fulfilling the promises of his campaign, pointing to a severe decrease in immigrants crossing to the United States from the neighbor of southern Mexico.
Some Trump team expressed frustration that the deportations are carried out very slowly. When I prompted him to the issue of the number of deportation in this second presidential term, Trump refused to give a personality.
“Well, I don’t put a number but I want to take out criminals quickly, and we do it, as you know,” he said. “We bring them to El Salvador, and many other places.”
3. More frustration with Putin
Trump expressed his frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin – crowned on a day in which Moscow’s economy was beaten by secondary sanctions if a deal on the war in Ukraine is not reached within 50 days.
After promising promises to end the war quickly, Trump seemed confused that he had not yet been able to connect an agreement with his Russian counterpart to end the conflict that lasted years ago.
He again indicated that there was a gap between the words and procedures by Putin: “
There was a temporary stop when I asked Trump if he could trust Putin, who answered: “I trust in almost anyone, to be honest.”
Ukrainian President Folodimir Zelinski and other European leaders have long accused Putin of not seriously ending the war. For them, feelings of doubt will not be new.
But when I asked Trump if he had ended with the Russian leader, he continued to leave the door open: “I did not do with him, but I was disappointed with him.”
4. A new tone on NATO
I indicated to Trump that he once suggested that NATO was outdated, and he answered that he now believed that the Western military alliance “has become the opposite.”
It was new to hosting NATO President Mark Roti – a man who seems to be able to work with him well. The couple exchanged warm words against the world’s cameras, and announced that the United States will sell weapons to NATO, which will then be transferred to Kiev.
During our invitation, Trump indicated that he was getting out of the grudge that his country had spent more than its allies.
“It was very unfair because the United States paid nearly a hundred percent of them, but they are now paying their own bills and I think this is much better,” and it seems that it indicates a pledge by NATO members to increase defense spending on 5 % of the economic production of each country.
He told me: “We have changed NATO a lot.”
5. Respect Starmer and the United Kingdom
Trump stressed his respect for the United Kingdom and Prime Minister, Sir Kerr Starmer, with whom he signed an agreement last month to remove some commercial barriers. “I really love the prime minister very much, although he is liberal,” Trump explained.
Trump stressed that the relationship between the two countries was equally “special” just as many Britons love to believe, adding that he believes that the United Kingdom will fight alongside the United States in the war.
He looked relaxed on the wealthy photographed against him. Although his visit to the state to the United Kingdom later this year will not require a speech to Parliament, he did not insist on summoning the legislators. “Let them go and spend a fun time,” he said.
Trump described his future king, King Charles as a “great man.” He ignored a recent speech by the Canadian parliament by the king, who was seen as supporting Canadian sovereignty in the face of Trump’s threats.
He even had a joke. “You have many different names you are going through,” he said. “England, if you want to cut two regions. You go to the United Kingdom, and you have Britain and you have Great Britain. You have received more names than any other country in history, I think.”
https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/1024/branded_news/c97d/live/fa3e46c0-6162-11f0-b5c5-012c5796682d.jpg
Source link