Stoieber and its colleagues at EWG monitor the available water filtering systems in the United States. The organization’s tests have found that joint jug fillers such as BRISTA and Bercyy Not everyone removes PFAS well on an equal basis. But some do an excellent job, based on EWG tests, including the jug candidate system made by Epic Water Filters, a US -based company.
“I would like to say that PFAS is to a largely polluted extent that we receive notes on our customers who are concerned,” says Joel Stevens, founder of Epic Water Filters. The filters make by his company include the water jugs of the carbon. “Thousands on thousands of carbon fiber layers wrapped around a mass,” he explains. While water flows through these fibers, carbon is released from PFAs and other pollutants, including chlorine and lead.
Within almost three months, the company will launch a new jug filter that can also obtain heavy metals and fluoride. Fluoride is added to water in some areas in order to improve dental health, although some people prefer not to drink it because of a possible link between fluoride and the harmful neurological effects. Scientific analysis indicates The risk of tap water in countries like the United States, however, is very low.
Stoiber says, while there are some very effective water filter products on the market.
Embarreneous water filters can return their consuming filters to the company. “The filters are then sent to a special recycling center where the plastic is recycled and the internal filters are burned,” said Stevens in an email to follow up.
Stoieber Research indicates that some forms of burning PFAS materials Harmful vehicles can be released In the environment. “We still have good recommendations to get rid of the spectacular media,” she says. It is possible to break the PFAS vehicles down, though Very high temperaturesUntil up to 1500 ° C (2,730 Fahrenheit). Some researchers are currently exploring how chemical additives such as a granular activated carbon can Reducing the amount of heat required To destroy PFAs.
There is another problem with the current approach of PFAS. Stoiber says: “Treating drinking water at the level of society is what is required at this stage, because the costs should not be located on the individual.” “It should not be unfair, who has a candidate, who does not, who is exposed.”
While some American drinking water facilities are now installing PFAs nomination technology on a large scale, As in Tampa, FloridaThe cost of doing this throughout the country It can turn into billionsAccording to some analyzes. While Stoieer says that the most effective strategy to avoid PFAS pollution is not the use of these chemicals in the first place, and countless companies are still doing, and it may pass a long time before they completely disappear from consumer products, if this happens.
Currently, there is a risk that the Trump administration can weaken the new American water regulations that require the removal of some PFAs from the tap water supply, says Stoiber. “We are fighting to protect the laws of drinking water just passed,” she says. “I think all eyes are on that.”
https://media.wired.com/photos/679a2bba083885e3514214ae/191:100/w_1280,c_limit/GettyImages-1647835043.jpg
Source link