A Interior documents gears It leaked from an unknown Chinese company that has declined the curtain on how to market and export digital control tools worldwide. Geedge Networks sells up to at least four countries, including Kazakhstan, Pakistan, Ethiopia and Myanmar. The pioneering leakage in the granular detail shows the capabilities that this company must monitor, intercede and penetrate the internet movement. The researchers who examined the files described it as “digital authoritarianism as a service.”
But I want to focus on something else showed by documents: While people often look at the Great Wall of Protection in China as a single, powerful, unique government system in China, the actual process of developing and maintaining it works in the same way as monitoring technology in the West. Geedge cooperates with academic institutions on research and development, and adapts to its business strategy to suit the needs of different customers, and even reshape the remaining infrastructure from their competitors. In Pakistan, for example, Geedge got a contract to work with and replace it later by the Canadian company Sandvine, the leaked files appear.
Similarly, another leakage of a different Chinese company published this week enhances the same point. On Monday, researchers at Vanderbilt University announced 399 pages From Golaxy, a Chinese company that uses artificial intelligence to analyze social media and generate advertising materials. The leaked documents, which include the floors of the stadium, work objectives, and meeting notes, may be from an indignant former employee – the last two thirsts accuse Jlacsi of mistreatment by pushing them to pay long hours. The document was sitting on the open internet for several months before another researcher informed him of Brett Goldstein, a research professor at the Faculty of Engineering at Vanderbelt.
Golaxy’s main works differ from Geedge’s: It collects open source information from social media, maps between political figures and news organizations, and pays the targeted accounts via the Internet through artificial social media features. In the leaked document, Golaxy claims to be the “first brand in analyzing large intelligence data” in China, serving three main agents: the Chinese Communist Party, Chinese government, and the Chinese army. The highly covered technological illustrations are focused on geopolitical issues such as Taiwan and Hong Kong and the American elections. Unlike Geedge, it seems that Golaxy only targets local government entities as clients.
But there are also a few things that make the two companies comparable, especially with regard to how their business works. GEEDGE and Golaxy maintains close relations with the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), a research institution affiliated with the Supreme Government in the world, according to Nature Index. Both are marketing their services on government agencies at the level of Chinese provinces, who have local issues that they want to monitor and budgets that spend them on monitoring tools and propaganda tools.
Gualasi did not immediately respond to a request to comment from WIRED. Previously answer For the New York Times, the company denied collecting data targeting American officials and called on the wrong information of the port. Vanderbilt researchers say they saw the company removes the pages from its website after initial reports.
Closer
In the West, when academic scientists see opportunities to market their advanced research, they often become emerging founders or start side companies. Julasi seems not an exception. Many of the company’s main researchers, according to the leaked document, are still running sites in Cas.
But there is no guarantee that CAS researchers will receive government grants – just like a professor of the United States in the United States, who cannot bet on federal contracts that escape. Instead, they need to follow government agencies like any private company that will pursue customers. One of the documents in the leakage shows that Golaxy has allocated sales goals for five employees and was aimed at securing 42 million yuan (about 5.9 million dollars) in contracts with Chinese government agencies in 2020. Another spreadsheet from around 2021 is listed by the current company’s agents, which include the branches of the Chinese army, state security, regional police bodies, as well as other potential customers.
https://media.wired.com/photos/68c19cdd2d648fe495c6715c/191:100/w_1280,c_limit/Made-In-China-How-Chinese-Surveillance-Works-Business.jpg
Source link