How did the highest votes in Amnesty International move from “our organization” to “unleash us”

On May 16, 2023, Sam Taman appeared Before a sub -committee of the Judicial Senate. The title of the session was “AI Supervision”. The session was a lovefest, where Altman and Senator celebrated what Altman called “the moment of the AI ​​printing press” – and recognizing that the United States needed strong laws to avoid its faults. “We believe that the organizational intervention by governments will be crucial in increasing the risk of strong models,” he said. Legionships commented on all the word Altman flowing on how to allow smart laws to prosper – but only within the company’s instructions that both legislators and artificial intelligence builders consider vital at that moment. Al -Taman was talking about this industry, which has widely shared his position. The cry of the battle was “our organization!”

Two years later, on May 8 this year, Altman returned to another group of Senate members. Senate and Altman were still singing the same tone, but one was withdrawn from a different operating list. This session was called “winning the artificial intelligence race.” In the capital, the word “supervision” fell from the preference, and the discourse of artificial intelligence is not an exception. Instead of calling for external bodies to examine artificial intelligence models for risk assessment, or platforms to alert people when they interact with artificial intelligence, committee chairman Ted Cruz has argued on a path not only in which the government feeds innovation, but also removes barriers such as “excessive organization”. It was on board. His message is no longer “organizing”, but “invest in me.” He said that excessive organization – like rules It was adopted by the European Union Or one bill recently California cassation is exposed It will be “disastrous”. “We need space for innovation and move quickly,” he said. He emphasized that safety rakils may be necessary, but they need to involve a “reasonable organization that does not slow us down.”

What happened? For one reason, the moment of panic after each person has passed before ChatgPT, and Become clear This Congress will not move quickly to artificial intelligence. But the biggest development is that Donald Trump regained the White House, hitting the brakes on the Biden administration’s minute and supporting the organization. Trump’s doctrine seems to be the artificial intelligence list closely close to Trump’s supporter Mark Anderson, who announced in him Optimistic technology statement The artificial intelligence organization literally was a form of killing because “any slowdown in artificial intelligence will cost lives.” Vice President JD Vance made these priorities clear in an international gathering held in Paris in February. “I am not here … to talk about the safety of artificial intelligence, which was the title of the conference two years ago,” he said. “We believe that the excessive organization of the artificial intelligence sector can kill a manufacturing industry exactly as it starts, and we will do its best to encourage artificial intelligence policies that support growth.” The administration was later revealed Artificial Intelligence Action Plan “To strengthen America’s position as Amnesty International and prevent unnecessary exhausting requirements from obstructing private sector innovation.”

Two enemies appeared in this movement. The first is the European Union that adopted a The regulatory system This requires transparency and accountability from major artificial intelligence companies. The White House despises this approach, as do those who build Amnesty International in the United States.

But the biggest Pogman is China. The possibility of the Republic of the People to photograph the United States in the “artificial intelligence race” is not to be perceived to the extent that the organization must be set aside, or what Altman and Cruz described as “a light touch.” Some of this logic comes from a theory known as the name “Difficult to take off,” Which is assumed that artificial intelligence models can reach a turning point where fast lightning self -improvement launches a group of amazing superior ability, also known as AGI. “If you get there first, you are a mysterious person, I will not be able to catch you,” Former Google Eric SchmidtWith being a competitor (you were a competitor (Schmidt was talking about the position of China as a leader in the open source.) Schmid is one of the highest votes that warn of this possible future. But the White House may be less interested in the individual than it is in classic economic competition.

Fear that China will advance artificial intelligence is the main driver of the current American policy, the safety is cursed. The party line objects to the individual countries that are trying to fill the vacuum of their laws. A copy of the tax bid, which was just passed by the house The default endowment On any legislation of artificial intelligence at the state level For 10 years. This is like eternity in terms of progress of artificial intelligence. (Critics say that this ruling will not survive some opposition in the Senate, but it should be noted that almost every Republic in the House of Representatives voted in his favor.)