How did the days of the Megan Markle Club glimpse her royal life struggles

Before going up to fame, Megan MarkleTime at Northwestern University and her involvement with Kaba Kaba Gama, highlighted her skills in Kaba Kaba.

The sisters of a women’s club praised their style, diplomacy and charitable work, although some found “excessive firm”.

Experts now note that these characteristics caused Meghan Markle’s clash with the royal protocol, which appreciates the discretionary authority over individuality.

Before Megan became the Duchess of Sussex or gained fame on “suits”, she was a student at North Western University in Ivanston, Illinois.

During her time there, she joined Kaba Kapa Gama, describing her Vanity Fair As a group of “smart, hot blondes in the Middle West”.

According to the royal commentator, Amanda Mata, the experiences of the Megan College and the women’s college provided early evidence about how to move in its royal role.

“Our organization’s stories show a person who wants to organize, guidance and contribute,” Matta said. “But I can see how the design that helped her in the college will later collide with the royal institution, which is not equivalent to individualism.”

Mata pointed out that the traits that are often celebrated in American culture, such as being “very convincing” or “firm”, can be considered as liabilities in a royal environment.

“In the Megan case, they appear repeatedly as negative recipes, whether it is as a president or a duchess that runs an employee.”

Talk to Fox News digitaland Matta added that Megan’s character would have appeared perfect for higher royal duties at first glance.

However, ownership gives priority to traditions, hierarchical sequences and protocol over individual taste, or stands out among other royal family members.

The sisters of our organization, Megan, remember that she is anyone and elegant. She advised fashion and makeup, and often helped facilitate conflicts inside the home.

“She was very attractive, and she has a big smile on her face, and she was a really nice person,” Hillele recalls in an interview with her 7NEWS. “I remember I thought this is a house I really wanted to be part of it, and I have ended up joining this club.”

However, Megan did not win everyone immediately. In the movie “Meghan and the Distking of the Ryclaarchy”, Princess Diana cited a biography of Andrew Morton, her ex -colleague Anne Mid, who described Megan as “excessively firm” and “a very convincing boy” for some of her peers.

Known as the openness that easily provided assistance, Megan soon became an unforgettable presence among the sisters of a women’s club.

“Mig was somewhat from this archaeological, developed creature, who lived with us and was always ready to lend you,” Rashi Liz Corses Graham remembers to Chicago Tribune.

However, according to British royal commentator Hillary Fordotch, as a prominent figure in the royal family is not always useful.

“The experience of Meghan Markle has definitely contributed to the lightness of the social movement, and expelled its ambition, but it is possible that it will predict the extension of the final culture that it lived in the most accurate ownership,” Fordwich told Fordwich. Fox News digital.

The expert noted that “the values ​​that stress the promotion of the individual self and their passion for seeing with the royal expectations of self -adaptation and commitment to the protocol within the hierarchical sequence.”

“It was initially common as ownership, but her lack of dedication to duty and … her participation in distorting members of the royal family made her popularity cannot be cannot be it cannot be,” Fordotch added.