How did the cat in the hat resulted in a ban on Dr. Souss’s Living films

Photo of author

By [email protected]







Dr. Souss was one of the most beloved names in children’s literature. Theodore Gizel (his real name, with Souss was the middle name) is one of the most prominent creative minds in the twentieth century, with stories and pictures of echo with the young and old. “Oh, the places you will go to!” It is prepared for any graduation ceremony from the middle school through the college. Stories such as “The Lorax” struck the same difficulty today for their direct comment on the world in general, as it is reflected in a fictional perspective. The “Cat in the Hat” is the “Cat in the Hat” is a great depiction of young children’s problems for children who are supervised by the game of GoodBall, which is not developed with the world’s most secure children’s science.

But while “The Cat in The Hat” (the book) is loved, and although the book inspired a few different adaptive capacities, the 2003 movie was released on a large scale. This is for a good reason as well; As you see yourself If you dare broadcast it on NetflixThe “Cat in the Hat” collects a wonderful list of actors and creativity in the service Large budget nightmare. Part of the problem is simply inherent in the work of Dr. Souss; Although his work is unforgettable, he is not heavy enough to dispense with a long adaptation, which means that the writers participating in such a project will have to add a lot of unnecessary sub -plans. But the fact that critics have been badly fulfilled by critics almost unnecessarily because the film was quickly by the fans with coarse box office receipts that it was an important scale. It is due to this The movie that banned Seuss’ Estate advanced live modifications.

Mike Mikes stumbled where Jim Carrey rose

To be clear, it is not that Dr. Souss himself banned such amendments; In fact, with his death in the fall of 1991, his wife Audrey fell to be a protection of the legacy that Souss left behind. Certainly, you did not refuse to get amendments Of some kind He made from his work. You can visit Dr. Souss under the title Universal Studios Orlando, although this was something that the company had to persuade it to do it. (It is somewhat similar to the level of participation that JK Rowling demanded in looking at how Universal brings the world of “Harry Potter” in its entertainment gardens all over the world.) Universal managed to win Geisel in the late nineties, not only by winning rights. How Greench stole Christmas “, but by convincing her that the only person who can play Grinch in real life is the comedian Jim Curry.

There is no doubt that Giselle’s comic sensitivity may not be the same as Carrie, but she agreed to his heart. And whether you think that the film was placed in 2025 or not (this writer may argue that he does not do it at all), it cannot be denying that the air conditioning “How Greench stole Christmas” was a huge blow to the box office, with the box office. , 260 million dollars locally. Of course, Universal wanted to return to the well, using another large comedy in another familiar world. Mike Maires, at the height of his fame as Austin Powers, partner, and “cat in the hat”. Once again in 2004, Giselle spoke today About the legacy of Souss (on the centenary), but also about how much it enjoyed a little of the business. “I have never seen” Austin Powers “, but I knew” Yes, my love! “Today I did not want (that) at all.”

Although this international man of ambiguity does not appear specifically in the movie, directed by Bo Walsh, it seems that Maires jumps from personality to character while photographing the harmful cat in the hat, closer to watching someone on a countryside on Disney’s genie but at work The neighborhood. Even at the time, it was clear that the film was not working, because it barely via a $ 100 million mark at the local box office and met with very harsh reviews.

The end of Dr. Souss Live Movies

Even with the presence of three writers who worked on the NBC “Seinfeld” comic play, even with Maeers joining Alec Baldwin and Kelly Preston, and even with a short jaw time for 82 minutes (this including final credit), the 2003 version of The Cat in The Hat. Giselle was able to intervene and demand such live ideas to go forward. Once again, it’s not as if Dr. Souss’s books were not a rich collection of options for people in the animation of adaptation. If you are looking for a copy of “The Cat in The Hat”, starring a Canadian -born Canurday Night Live, you will use well by watching the PBS animation starring Martin Short as a dreamer. The children’s program may not be the most quality, but it is more enjoyable than the movie. More importantly, she feels a threat to Dr. Souss through the fact that she is moving.

To prolong, although the live adjustments of Seuss work stopped, Universal has once again managed to continue using things using Seuss as a source of intellectual property. One of the main animation studios, Ellumination Entertainment, has already created features of “The Lorax” (Danny Devito starring as a title letter, along with ED Helms, Zac Effron and Taylor Swift) as well Nevertheless, we will see new copies of the animated. Next, Warner Bros. is that we will see a new experience … well, nothing but the hat in Yes, animation will beAnd yes, he will play the role of “SNL” as the title letter. But this time, Bill Hader will be like a cat, joined by Quinta Bronson, Bowen Yang, and others. Although GEISELS has passed since then, we can only hope that these new titles are honored. If there is nothing else, then the new “cat” cannot be worse than the living serpent.





Source link

https://www.slashfilm.com/img/gallery/how-the-cat-in-the-hat-led-to-a-ban-on-live-action-dr-seuss-movies/l-intro-1738181671.jpg

Leave a Comment