How can the proposed endowment affect the state’s rules of artificial intelligence

Congress will run out of the brakes on any rules and laws in the state around it artificial intelligence Under the language in the Grand Federal Office Bill now before the US Senate. Supporters say this step will help the industry to grow and compete with the developers of artificial intelligence in China, while critics say it will limit the strength of anyone other than the federal government to put handrails around a technology that has quickly become a major part of our lives.

the an offer Any country or political division says, “It may apply any law or regulation that regulates the models of artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence systems, or automatic decision -making systems,” for a period of 10 years. In May, the House of Representatives voted difficult to approve the full budget bill, which also includes the extension of federal tax cuts for 2017 and Discounts to services such as medicaid And Snap.

Artificial intelligence developers and some legislators said that federal measures are necessary to prevent states from creating a group of different rules and regulations throughout the United States that can slow down technology growth. Rapid growth in artificial intelligence since Openai Chatgpt It exploded at the scene of the accident in late 2022, which led the companies to fit technology in the largest possible number of spaces. Economic effects are important, as the United States and China race to find out any country technology will prevail, but obstetric artificial intelligence constitutes privacy, transparency and other risks for consumers who lawmakers sought to mitigate.

“We need, as an industry and a country, one of the pure federal standard, whatever it is,” Alexander Wang, founder and director of the data company. April hearing. “But we need one, we need clarity regarding one federal criteria and we have a recovery to prevent this result as you have 50 different criteria.”

Not all artificial intelligence companies support the endowment, however. in New York TimesAnd the CEO of Anthropor, Dario Amani, described it as “very frank”, saying that the federal government should create transparent criteria for artificial intelligence companies instead. “The presence of the national transparency standard not only helps the public but also understands Congress how technology develops, so that legislators can determine whether more governmental procedures are needed.”

Efforts to reduce the ability of states to organize artificial intelligence may mean fewer consumer protection about technology that is increasingly leaking to every aspect of American life. “There have been a lot of discussions at the state level, and I think it is important for us to deal with this problem at multiple levels,” said Anjana Susara, a professor at Michigan State University, who is studying Amnesty International. “We can handle it at the national level. We can deal with it at the state level as well. I think we need both.”

Several states have already started organizing artificial intelligence

The proposed language will prevent states from enforcing any list, including those already on books. Exceptions are the rules and laws that make things easier to develop artificial intelligence and those that apply the same standards to other models and systems that do similar things. These types of regulations have already started to appear. The largest concentration is not in the United States, but in Europe, where the European Union has already implemented Artificial intelligence standards. But the countries started entering into work.

Colorado A group passed From the protection of consumers last year, it is scheduled to enter into force in 2026. California adopted more than ten related Amnesty International Laws last year. Other countries have laws and regulations that often deal with specific issues Like Deepfakes Or ask artificial intelligence developers to publish information about their training data. At the local level, some regulations also deal with a potential discrimination of employment if artificial intelligence systems are used in employment.

“Countries all over the map when it comes to what they want to organize in artificial intelligence,” said Arsene Korenian, a lawyer for the law company Meyer Brown. To date in 2025, the state lawmakers have been presented at least 550 proposals About artificial intelligence, according to the National Conference of the State Legislative Councils. At the hearing of the House of Representatives Committee last month, Representative Jay Obernol, a Republican of California, indicated the desire to apply for more regulations at the state level. “We have a limited amount of the legislative runway to be able to solve this problem before the United States advances,” he said.

While some countries have laws on books, not all of them entered into force or saw any application. This limits the potential effect on the short term of the priority. “There is no application yet.”

Zeville Caagan said fuel would deter lawmakers and policy makers from developing and proposing new regulations. “The federal government will become the primary and monotheistic organization on artificial intelligence systems,” he said.

What a stood in the organization of the state artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence developers have requested that any handrail placed on their work is consistent and simplified. During the Senate Trade Committee Listen last weekThe CEO of Openai Sam Altman told the Senator Ted Cruz, a Republican of Texas, that an organizational system similar to the European Union will be “catastrophic” for the industry. Altman instead suggested that the industry develop its own standards.

When asked about Senator Brian Chatez, a democratic of Hawaii, if the self -organization of the industry is sufficient at the present time, Al -Tamman said he believed that some handrails will be good, but “it is easy to go away. Since I learned more about how the world works, I am much more afraid and have very bad consequences.” (Disclosure: Zif Davis, the parent company of CNET, filed a lawsuit against Openai, claimed that it had violated the copyright of ZifF Davis in training and operating its AI systems).

Corinian said that concerns of companies, both developers who create artificial intelligence systems and “publishers” who use them in interactions with consumers, often stem from fears that countries will impose a great work such as impact assessments or transparency notifications before the product is issued. Consumer advocates said that more regulations are needed, and the ability of countries’ ability to harm the privacy and safety of users.

“Artificial intelligence is widely used to make decisions about people’s lives without transparency, accountability, or asylum – it also facilitates fraud, plagiarism and monitoring,” said Ben Winters, the director of artificial intelligence and privacy at the Consumer Union in America. “Stopping for 10 years may lead to more discrimination, more deception and simply control, it stands with technology companies on the people who affect him.”

Corinian said that the opening endowment on the specific rules and laws of the state could lead to the treatment of more consumer protection cases in the court or by state lawyers. Current laws on unfair and misleading practices that do not belong to artificial intelligence are still applied. “The time will tell us how judges will explain these cases,” he said.

Sosarla said that the spread of artificial intelligence through industries means that countries may be able to organize issues such as privacy and transparency on a wider scale, without focusing on technology. But standing on the regulation of artificial intelligence can lead to such policies associated with lawsuits. She said, “There must be a kind of balance between” we don’t want to stop innovation “, but on the other hand, we also need to realize that there can be real consequences.”

Zeville Caagan said many policy on the governance of artificial intelligence systems is caused by the so -called annoying rules and laws of technology. “It is also useful to remember that there are a lot of existing laws, and there is a possibility to prepare new laws that do not lead to standing on the endowment, but applies to artificial intelligence systems as long as they apply to other systems,” he said.

The discussion of artificial intelligence is transferred to the Senate

With the draft law now in the hands of the US Senate – and with more people’s awareness of the proposal – chose the discussion about standing. Senate members of both sides, including the Republicans, expressed Sis. Josh Holie and Marsha Blackburn, about their fears. In the Senate, this measure can be stripped of the budget due to the so -called Bird baseThis is prohibited from anything that is not the budget issue to be included in the reconciliation bill.

Whatever the draft law of the Senate, it will have to be accepted by the House of Representatives, as it has gone through the narrowest margins. Even some members of the House of Representatives who voted in favor of the draft law said they did not like the endowment, that is, MP Margori Taylor Green, the main ally of President Trump. The Republic of Georgia It was published on X this week It “strongly opposes” the endowment and that it will not vote for the draft law with a peak endowment.

At the state level, a A message signed by 40 state lawyers – From both parties- Congress called for a refusal to endow the endowment and instead the establishment of this broader regulatory system. They wrote: “This draft law does not propose any regulatory plan to replace or complete the laws that have been currently or under consideration by the states, and the Americans have left completely not completely protected from the potential damage of Amnesty International.”