How Anna Winner really felt about the role of Merle Strip, The Devil Wears Prada

There are some very terrifying presidents in the history of cinema, but Merrill Strip in Miranda’s priestly role in “The Devil Wears Prada” should be among the most intimidated things. She is the editor -in -chief of the fictional “Runway” fashion magazine, and she is aspired, claimed, and cruel. This makes life an absolute hell for its employees, especially its new personal assistance, ambitious journalist Andy Sachs (Ann Hathaway). As a nightmare like Miranda, it is also impressive, and STREP performance is among her best (This really says something – this woman is power!).

When watching “The Devil Wears Prada”, it is difficult not to wonder how inspired by Miranda from the editor -in -chief of “Vogue” for a long time Anna Winner, not only because both are editors in the high -energy fashion magazine with sharp situations.

Lauren Wessberger, author of “The Devil Wears Prada”, worked as a helping assistant before writing her novel based on what she felt about the culture of “Vogue” office, although she denied that Miranda was based directly on her former president. Strip has similarly denied that she is trying to make a caricature of Wintour, although it is difficult to deny that there are elements of the famous “Vogue” editor that appears to be reflected very in Miranda’s behavior. But what is her opinion on Wintenor herself in everything? Her distinguished response was Anna Winner Miranda, the pure priestly, too.

According to the author Amy Odel in “Anna: CV” (across Entertainment weekly), Wintour was very interested in the whole matter, and she was told even the “Vogue” editor at the time that she did not even remember who was Weisberger when learning about her novel. Big Oouch, but this looks exactly like the type of thing that Miranda might say about Andy, whether she remembers her or not, so it is funny. While most of her colleagues described Wintour as “fun” with the movie more than anything else, there are at least hints of some of these pictures. Odell described the first show, which was attended by Wintour and Weisberger, draws a little more complicated:

(Director David) Franklke sat behind Anna and (Winner’s daughter) PB.

Although there is no worse burning than your son, who tells you that a full movie (almost wrestle), Wintour was a beautiful illiteracy about the movie most often. “She said”60 minutesThis film was not a real show of what was happening inside this magazine “and it was simply” entertaining. “Fortunately, it showed a sense of humor over time, and even sitting for an individual magazine, on nearly one energy, as there was jokingly in the interview, where there was joking in everything.

Streep made some major changes to her role In order to take it, including giving the character a vital moment of weakness. It is difficult to imagine “The Devil Wears Prada” without The moment of raw ray is reallyAllow her to be human, so it may recognize Winner. Or maybe the game only gets to know the game.

The “Devil Wears Prada” did nothing highly leading with his story, but one place where he was shining in allowing his female characters to be truly chaotic and complex. Although most of the main characters get at least one or moments when you are really supposed to sympathize with them, none of them are not the types of people you really want to be close to them. They all serve themselves, are obsessed with the job, ready to be volatile and harsh as a way to survive in the world of dog dog works, it is difficult to move as more than a man as a man or fashion industry or not. The industry incited them against each other, and while they definitely discover it somewhat, there too Complementary businessSo they were unable to learn Which – which A lot about cute gameplay, can they?

Wintour may be just a source of inspiration for Miranda, but the interpretation of Streep of the character and Star force helped make “The Devil Wears Prada” In classics it is today. It made it look good.