Hours before Iran hit an American military base in Qatar on Monday in response to the bombing of three of its nuclear facilities, US President Donald Trump said that what some experts fear may lead to the recurrence of history itself.
In a post on the social humanitarian platform, Trump wrote on Sunday afternoon, “Why will there be a change in the system ???”
As for the presence of Mohamed Tafakuli Taraghi, a professor of near and eastern civilizations at the University of Toronto, the answer is present.
If the United States has toppled the Iranian government-again-Tavakouli Taragi said, “It will create greater chaos in the Middle East than anyone could have imagined.”
This scenario has become less likely after Trump confirmed in a publication on Monday evening that Iran and Israel – which began bombing Iranian nuclear and military sites on June 13 – I reached the ceasefire agreement. But it will not be the first time that the United States has participated in a conflict in Iran.
Richard Haas, a former US State Department official, says President Donald Trump has not done any preferences by reflecting on regime change in Iran. Haas says it is not an applicable strategy and may invite more revenge on the nation in the Middle East.
What happened in 1953?
In 1953, A coup by the CIA The first democratically elected leader of Iran, Muhammad Musadigi, forced the rest of his life under the arrest of the house. This also led, according to experts who spoke with CBC News, to the 1979 Islamic Revolution and the repressive government that rules the country today.
But replacing this government through external forces will drown in the region into more turmoil.
“I do not understand the game’s plan,” said Lucan Way, a professor of democracy at the University of Toronto. “My intestine is that this would make a very popular system.”
Documents that the Central Intelligence Agency is facing in 2013 It revealed that the American Intelligence Organization overthrew the Iranian Prime Minister, in August 1953 by organizing riots sympathetic to Muhammad Reza Bahlvi, the Shah of Iran.
Mosaddegh was arrested, then he tried and was convicted of betrayal in the Shah Military Court. Pahlavi regained power to his ownership, which was sympathetic to Western interests, which is British control of Iranian oil reserves.
Mosaddegh was elected to a promise to secure Iranian oil. At that time, the Iranian Oil Company, owned by the British (now known as BP), shared only a small amount of its profits with the country, to increase discontent.
The 1950s
While the United States was initially supporting the aspirations of Mosaddegh and its liberal government, it began to fear that it would be pressured by communism by the Soviet Union, which competed for power in the world order.
Wilson Chako Jacob, a history professor at the University of Concordia at Montreal, said the initiatives whose goals were the return of the beautiful to the people, especially in the previously colonial states, were easily seen as steps towards communism and thus a threat to their interests.
“The United States is witnessing its efforts after the Second World War to operate the allies in defense of what they will call” freedom, “freedom of capital all over the world,” he said. “Of course, most of that capital settled with the United States by the end of World War II.”
Jacob said that the fifties of the last century were also time to end colonialism “not complete.” The ancient colonial powers, like Great Britain, were trying to adhere to power over foreign countries. “This (was) the defense of global capitalism.”
Today, Israel is seen by many as maintaining American interests in the region. However, others see President Benjamin Netanyahu as causing more turmoil due to his expansionary actions, such as allowing settlements to grow in the West Bank, and now, he is trying to control Gaza.
“At the heart of the conflict (between Israel and Iran), the ideological and political commitment to Iranian countries to establish the Palestinian state. Otherwise, Iran is far from Israel (and) has no reason to worry about Israel,” said Tafakouli Taragi.
Fears of nuclear development
While the threat in the fifties of the last century, in the eyes of the United States and the United Kingdom, may have been communism and the Soviet Union, Tafakouli Taraghi said that the imagined threat had evolved into “Islamic fundamentalism, terrorism and nuclear weapons.”
Israel believes that the Iranian nuclear program represents an existential threat, but it and the University of Toronto, noticed that Israel did not sign the treaty on the non -spread of nuclear weapons, which entered into force in 1970, but Iran did.
Although it is “logical” that Israel wants to follow the Iranian nuclear capabilities, WAY is that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has created increasing sympathy for countries that do not have nuclear weapons.
“Unless a large country with a large army can defend its borders, nuclear weapons are a much cheaper choice as a kind of foreign invasion insurance policy,” he said.
After Pahlavi, the Shah of Iran, took control of the Iranian parliament in 1953, he struggled to gain legitimacy within its borders, and a religious movement began motivated by Rohleh Khomeini to win acceptance – in the end leading to the Islamic revolution in Iran in 1979.
Way said: “Part of what brought the current regime to power was this type of anti -America, which was based on a large basis in 1953,” Way
Hamed Esmaeilion, the former president of the Ps752 Families Association and the Canadian Human Rights Activist, is participating his ideas about the escalating Israeli -Iranian conflict. Esmaeilion lost his wife and daughter when he dropped the Iranian Islamic Guard Corps in Ukraine 752 with two missiles from the surface to the air, killing all 176 passengers, in 2020.
https://i.cbc.ca/1.7569006.1750723369!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/16x9_1180/iran-1953-coup-queen.jpg?im=Resize%3D620
Source link