Hardy’s concession has long sued a series of conflict over the concession agreement

Hardi’s privilege has been a long -term and fast food chain in the midst of a legal battle.

Group Paradigm Investment Group, a privilege for more than 25 years with more than Six Decies from Hardy Restaurants All parts of Alabama, Florida, Mississippi and Tennessee, her Harde owned by CKE RESTAURARANS with a lawsuit with a lawsuit in mid -April.

In the lawsuit, the concession claimed that Hardez “threatened to take the model restaurants without justifying the penalties on the dollar.”

Paradigm said it had received a notice of negligence and termination from Hardez in mid -January to inform the concession that the series “is considered the model in a state of negligence of concession agreements regarding many commercial practices that were in a three -year conflict.”

The notice said that the model was backward because it did not pay a monthly “technical fee”, or used the delivery of the third party, or used an application or loyalty to Hardy. In addition, some of its stores did not abide by certain hours The lawsuit.

Fast food workers should work for about an hour to provide the meals they serve

“In the payment notice of payment, HR (Hardy Restaurants) announced that failure to comply with all its demands on April 15 or before, will end all concession agreements and will lead to the human resources model about $ 13 million of refinery damage and that human resources can exercise their rights to obtain a low value,”

However, Paradigm claims that he had “justified him in his decision not to participate” in “Hardy’s illegal demands” and that Hardy was “mistaken in his belief that the model had violated” the concession agreements with the series.

He argued that technology, loyalty, application, and third -party delivery program was not part of his concession agreements.

The model claimed that these requirements were added through updates to Hardy’s operations guide.

When it comes to hours of the operation, the model argued that some of Its restaurants In the afternoon instead of keeping it open until 10 pm, “it does not cause any cash damage” to Hardy, and instead “it is financially” the chain.

Get Fox Business on the Go by clicking here

The owner of the concession argued that these restaurants were better in terms of sales, profitability and keeping employees compared to the time they remained for full hours.

The model also claimed that many of the companies owned by the companies owned From 6 am to 10 pm the minimum working hours.

Paradigm Don Wollan said Franchise times This was Hardy, “Shocking things on our throat, which was not in the concession agreement.”

In the lawsuit, the concession owner confirmed that Hardez told the lender in 2022 that the model was in a “good situation under each concession agreement”, which was the form of the model that he denied Hardy’s current claims.

Paradigm asked the court from the introductory ruling in favor of it and the issuance of a judicial order regarding the end of the concession agreements, among other matters.

With economic uncertainty, Americans spend less on fast food

CKE restaurants have not been able to comment as the case is an active legal issue.

The company has the brands of Harde and Carl’s JR.

Roark Capital Group got a majority share in CKE in 2013.