Had it not been for Brazil to Trump on the trial of Bolsonaro and definitions

Brazilian President Louise Ensio Lula Da Silva defended the trial that has witnessed his predecessor in his post, Gear Bolsonaro, to sentenced more than 27 years in prison by planning a coup.

In an opinion article Posted in the New York TimesHe rejected if not for US President Donald Trump describing the trial as a “charming chase”, saying that it was “a historic decision that protects our institutions and the rule of democratic law.”

The Brazilian leader said he wrote the article to create an open dialogue and Frank with US President Donald Trump, who imposed a 50 % tariff on Brazilian imports.

He called for the high customs tariff “not only misleading but illogical.”

He said that over the past fifteen years, “the United States has accumulated a surplus of $ 410 billion (302 billion pounds) in bilateral trade in goods and services,” adding that the decision to impose definitions can only be political.

“The US government is using definitions and Magnitsky’s law to search for punishment for former President Jair Bolsonaro,” the US government is using definitions and Magnitsky Law to search for punishment for former President Jair Bolsonaro, “referring to the sanctions imposed by the United States on the Supreme Court judge who led the trial against Polsonaro,” Lola wrote, in reference to the sanctions imposed by the United States on the Supreme Court judge who led the trial against Bolsonaro.

The trial ended on Thursday when four of the five Supreme Court judges found it in the committee in charge of ruling Bolsonaro on all the five charges he was facing. A simple majority was needed to condemn it.

Bolsonaro was sentenced to 27 years and 3 months in prison – a penalty that his lawyers say will appeal.

Trump said he found the ruling “very surprising” and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the United States “will respond accordingly to the witch’s fishing.”

In his article in the New York Times, Lula insisted that the trial was “not” a charming chase. “

“The ruling was the result of the procedures that were implemented in accordance with the 1988 constitution, which was two decades after the struggle against the military dictatorship,” he wrote, to remind readers that Brazil’s democracy was restored in 1985 after 20 years of military rule.

Lula also rejected the Trump administration accusations that the system of issues in Brazil had targeted and monitored American technology companies.

The Brazilian President said that his country’s courts were right to organize the Internet and that American companies have not been treated fairly.

He concluded his article by addressing President Trump directly, and told his American counterpart that Brazil is still open to negotiate “anything that can achieve mutual benefits”, but he warned Trump that “Brazilian democracy and sovereignty is not on the table.”